Trump Faces Uphill Battle Seeking China’s Help on Iran Conflict 
Nvidia’s China AI Chip Sales Remain Frozen Despite U.S. Approval 
Russia Launches Massive Drone and Missile Attack on Kyiv 
Mexico Denies CIA Role in Cartel Attacks Amid Rising U.S.-Mexico Tensions 
Vance Says Progress Made in Iran Nuclear Talks as Trump Rejects Tehran Proposal 
New Zealand Budget 2026 Focuses on Fiscal Discipline and Infrastructure Investment 
US-China Trade Talks Begin in South Korea Ahead of Trump-Xi Beijing Summit 
Florida to Close “Alligator Alcatraz” Migrant Detention Center Amid Criticism 
Kyrgyzstan Coup Plot Charges Shake Japarov Government Amid Political Tensions 
Dulles Airport Rebuild Plan Could Transform Washington’s Main International Gateway 
Macron Faces Political Test Over Bank of France Nomination Ahead of 2027 Election 
Tennessee Republicans Remove Democrats From Committees After Redistricting Protest 
Havana Protests Erupt as Cuba Faces Severe Blackouts and Fuel Crisis 
Bahamas Election 2026: Prime Minister Philip Davis Secures Historic Second Term 
Australia Housing Tax Reform Sparks Debate Over Property Investor Tax Breaks 
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over Trump Administration’s Flavored E-Cigarette Policy 
Trump Administration Appoints David Venturella as Acting ICE Director Amid Immigration Crackdown 
Many have expressed frustration at the DOJ regarding the fact that Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has not been presented with an indictment over his refusal to cooperate with the Jan. 6 committee. According to Watergate attorney Jill Wine-Banks, two possible federal crimes may be the reason why the DOJ has not indicted the former Trump aide for contempt of Congress.
Speaking on MSNBC, Wine-Banks suggested that the reason why the DOJ is not indicting Meadows for contempt is possibly due to violating two federal crimes. This comes as Los Angeles Times legal analyst Harry Litman said that Meadows appears to be “up to his neck” with the two federal crimes.
“I think some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the Department of Justice has not yet indicted Mark Meadows for contempt, and it may be because these documents show him to be an active participant in a coup,” said Wine-Banks.
“And maybe they are looking at him more seriously for a substantive part and for obstructing Congress. I think he could be guilty of both and that it is very important to work between Congress and the prosecutors to make sure of that,” Wine-Banks explained, noting that Congress would not be granting Meadows any immunity if the Justice Department seeks to indict him.
Wine-Banks went on to explain that Congress’s main role is to pass laws to prevent such a coup attempt from happening again, and they can take these measures without Meadows’s testimony if the DOJ plans to indict the former congressman.
The text messages to Meadows related to January 6 were revealed to come from several Republican members of Congress. Following Reps. Chip Roy and Jim Jordan and Senator Mike Lee, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was also revealed to have texted Meadows.
Days prior to Joe Biden’s inauguration, Greene appeared to send Meadows a message pressing Donald Trump to overturn his 2020 election loss by invoking martial law. Meadows did not seem to respond to Greene’s text message, but the messages to Meadows underline the ideas that were being floated around the former president’s circle after Congress ultimately certified Biden’s election victory.
