China Conducts Live-Fire Naval Drill Near Japan’s Okinotori Island Amid Joint Operation With Russia 
ASEAN Summit Faces Pressure as U.S.-Iran Conflict, South China Sea Tensions Dominate Agenda 
Hungary President Tamas Sulyok Removed After Constitutional Amendment Signed 
Trump Vows Iran Will ‘Pay’ After U.S. Troop Deaths as Conflict Escalates 
South Korea’s Coupang Fine Sparks U.S. Criticism, Raising Concerns Over Bilateral Ties 
US Service Member Killed During Explosive Disposal of Downed Iranian Drone in Iraq 
Eduardo Bolsonaro Granted U.S. Green Card Amid Brazil Legal Battle and Tariff Dispute 
Trump Urges Canada to Curb Ontario Wildfires, Floats Tariffs Over Smoke Impact 
Trump Calls for Review of Federal Judicial Center Climate Science Manual 
ASEAN Ministers Warn Middle East Conflict Threatens Regional Stability and Energy Security 
Ralph Norman Launches South Carolina Senate Bid After Lindsey Graham’s Death 
Trump Tightens China Sourcing Rules for U.S. Defense Contractors 
Trump Says Talks With UK PM Andy Burnham Went Well, Signals Meeting Soon 
Japan PM Sanae Takaichi Unveils Growth Plan as BOJ Independence Concerns Lift Bond Yields 
JD Vance and Wife Usha Welcome Fourth Child, Son Alec Neel Vance 
Trump Set to Unveil New Tariffs on Dozens of Countries as Global 10% Duty Nears Expiration 
Israeli Airstrike Kills Family of Six in Gaza as Ceasefire Death Toll Mounts 
Many have expressed frustration at the DOJ regarding the fact that Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has not been presented with an indictment over his refusal to cooperate with the Jan. 6 committee. According to Watergate attorney Jill Wine-Banks, two possible federal crimes may be the reason why the DOJ has not indicted the former Trump aide for contempt of Congress.
Speaking on MSNBC, Wine-Banks suggested that the reason why the DOJ is not indicting Meadows for contempt is possibly due to violating two federal crimes. This comes as Los Angeles Times legal analyst Harry Litman said that Meadows appears to be “up to his neck” with the two federal crimes.
“I think some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the Department of Justice has not yet indicted Mark Meadows for contempt, and it may be because these documents show him to be an active participant in a coup,” said Wine-Banks.
“And maybe they are looking at him more seriously for a substantive part and for obstructing Congress. I think he could be guilty of both and that it is very important to work between Congress and the prosecutors to make sure of that,” Wine-Banks explained, noting that Congress would not be granting Meadows any immunity if the Justice Department seeks to indict him.
Wine-Banks went on to explain that Congress’s main role is to pass laws to prevent such a coup attempt from happening again, and they can take these measures without Meadows’s testimony if the DOJ plans to indict the former congressman.
The text messages to Meadows related to January 6 were revealed to come from several Republican members of Congress. Following Reps. Chip Roy and Jim Jordan and Senator Mike Lee, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was also revealed to have texted Meadows.
Days prior to Joe Biden’s inauguration, Greene appeared to send Meadows a message pressing Donald Trump to overturn his 2020 election loss by invoking martial law. Meadows did not seem to respond to Greene’s text message, but the messages to Meadows underline the ideas that were being floated around the former president’s circle after Congress ultimately certified Biden’s election victory.
