Samsung Workers Approve Wage Deal, Avoiding Major Strike and Boosting Chip Supply Confidence 
Xiaomi Shares Drop After Weak Q1 Earnings Amid Rising Smartphone Costs 
Samsung Union Dispute Escalates Over Semiconductor Bonus Vote 
EU Antitrust Probe Could Lead to Massive Google Fine Under DMA Rules 
SpaceX IPO Hype Raises Questions as Many Major Stock Debuts Underperform Market 
MongoDB Q1 FY2027 Earnings Beat Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook 
SpaceX IPO Could Become Largest in History with $1.8 Trillion Valuation Target 
Elon Musk Explores Possible Tesla-SpaceX Merger Amid Growing AI Investments 
Morgan Stanley Names Top AI Security and Data Center Stocks for 2026 
Blue Origin New Glenn Rocket Explodes During Launch Pad Test, Delaying Space Ambitions 
SpaceX Delays Starship V3 Launch Ahead of Potential Record IPO 
Autodesk Beats Q1 Estimates, Acquires MaintainX for $3.6 Billion 
PDG Explores $1 Billion Sale of China Data Center Assets 
SK Hynix Joins $1 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Fuels Stock Surge 
Meta Subscription Push Could Add Billions in Recurring Revenue, Says Rosenblatt 
Synopsys Q2 FY2026 Earnings Beat Driven by AI and Semiconductor Demand 
HP Q2 2026 Earnings Beat Expectations Despite Memory Chip Pressure 
After releasing the GTX 16 series, a lot of people have been complaining about Nvidia’s naming schemes and the confusion of its GPU lineup. Now, more complains are being voiced online after it found out that the laptop and desktop variant of one of its series has quite the disparity in performance.
Specifically, Nvidia’s RTX 2060, 2070, and 2080 GPU. So what’s the issue here?
First, is that the Nvidia RTX 2080 card has about eight to 10 percent gap in performance between its desktop and mobile counterpart. The RTX 2070 has about 14 to 18 percent, which furrowed a lot of brows. But what really got the community upset is the 20 to 25 percent performance difference of the RTX 2060 between its desktop and mobile variant.
Nvidia doesn’t provide a clear distinction between mobile and desktop variants
To put into perspective, Nvidia’s mobile GTX 1060 Ti is only five percent slower than the mobile RTX 2060, with the former retailing hundreds of dollars less than the latter, Notebookcheck reported. The problem here is that Nvidia doesn’t provide a clear distinction between the desktop and mobile GPUs, which may lead people to assume that both are able to perform relatively closely.
With AMD eating a significant chunk of Nvidia’s market share, one would think that the latter would go about cleaning up its confusing names, but it appears that the company only muddied the waters further. Back in January, GameDebate launched a poll asking people if Nvidia’s naming schemes are too confusing and the majority of the participants said that it is.
Nvidia may be launching a GTX 1660 Super card
Following Notebookcheck’s report, TechRadar has reached out to Nvidia to asked them for comment, but the company has yet to respond as of this writing. It would be interesting to see how the GPU manufacturer explains this one.
On the rumors side of things, there are reports going around that Nvidia will be releasing the GTX 1660 Super in response to AMD’s mid-range dominance. The super variant will apparently have its memory bumped to 6GB of 14Gbps GDDR6 memory while maintaining the TU116-300 die and 1,408 CUDA. The GTX 1660 and 1660 Ti will not be discontinued if the rumors are to be believed.
