A leading historic preservation group has filed a lawsuit against U.S. President Donald Trump and several federal agencies in an effort to block construction of a proposed $300 million ballroom at the White House site, raising significant legal and preservation concerns. The lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court in Washington, D.C., challenges the demolition of the White House’s East Wing and the rapid advancement of the 90,000-square-foot ballroom project without what the group says are legally required reviews and approvals.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon confirmed he will hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s request for a temporary order to stop construction. According to the nonprofit organization, the project moved forward without public input and failed to comply with federal statutes that mandate consultations with the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts before altering historically significant federal property.
The lawsuit argues that no president has the unilateral authority to demolish parts of the White House without oversight, regardless of party affiliation. The group is also seeking to pause construction until environmental impact reviews are completed, relevant federal commissions approve the plans, and Congress formally authorizes the project.
The ballroom is part of a series of major changes President Trump has made to the White House since returning to office in January. These changes reportedly include extensive gold décor added to the Oval Office and the replacement of the Rose Garden lawn with a paved patio reminiscent of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
In response, White House spokesman Davis Ingle stated that President Trump has full legal authority to modernize, renovate, and enhance the White House, noting that past presidents have also made significant changes to the historic residence.
Carol Quillen, president and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, emphasized that public engagement is essential when altering a symbol of American democracy. She said that inviting public comment reflects respect for the nation’s heritage and helps ensure changes leave a lasting and appropriate legacy.


US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday 



