SK Broadband announced on Thursday, Sept. 30 that it had filed a countersuit against Netflix over network usage fees. It was reported that the lawsuit had been based on the court decision in June, which favored the Korean internet service provider.
In April, Netflix’s Korean unit sued SK Broadband and requested the court in Seoul to confirm that it is not its duty to pay the said usage fees concerning data traffic. In June, the court released its decision that ruled against Netflix in the dispute, and the streaming firm filed for an appeal in July.
The Seoul Central District Court rejected and dismissed Netflix’s request that states it has no obligation to pay network usage fees to SK Broadband. Thus, the appeal was filed in an effort to reverse the decision.
“There has never been a case globally where a court or a government forced content providers to pay for network fees,” Netflix said in a statement. “The decision may topple the global internet ecosystem developed by content providers and internet service providers.”
More than two months after Netflix filed its appeal, The Korea Herald reported that SK Broadband, one of the leading broadband internet providers in the country, heads to the Seoul High Court to countersue the streaming service provider.
This move was said to be a follow-up measure as Netflix did not respond to the broadband firm’s proposals. Likewise, SK Broadband went on to file its countersuit so it could finally claim fees for the use of its network so Netflix could provide its service in South Korea.
“Netflix is free-riding on our network that is provided at cost due to the huge spending in initial establishment and annual maintenance,” Pulse News quoted SK Broadband as saying regarding the case. It added that it has decided to countersue because, despite the ruling, Netflix continues to refuse to enter negotiations so they can reach an agreement.
SK Broadband stressed that as of September this year, Netflix Korea consumes around 1,200Gbps of traffic on its network. This number is said to be a big increase from May 2018, when it was only consuming 50Gbps.
The company further noted that maintaining this service for the streaming giant is definitely not for free. Finally, it was estimated that the network usage fee involved in the dispute could reach up to $84.4 million or ₩100 billion.


Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
Silver Prices Plunge in Asian Trade as Dollar Strength Triggers Fresh Precious Metals Sell-Off
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
Bank of Japan Signals Readiness for Near-Term Rate Hike as Inflation Nears Target 



