SMIC Shares Rally as Q2 Profit Surges 262% on Strong Chip Demand 
Lenovo Revenue Surges 43% as AI Demand Drives Record First-Quarter Growth 
Trump Election Order Blocked Again as Appeals Court Rejects Mail-In Voting Push in 23 States 
Micron Stock Upgraded to Buy as New Street Sees $2 Trillion Valuation Potential 
Aviva First-Half Operating Profit Jumps 24% as Direct Line Deal Boosts Growth 
China Automakers Accelerate Global Expansion as Domestic Car Sales Slump 
SEC Clears Path for Data Center Securitizations as AI Financing Demand Surges 
Lebanon Lawyers Seek Probe Into Banker Over Alleged Netanyahu Dinner in Washington 
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits 
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges 
Apple Develops China-Specific AI Model With Alibaba as Apple Intelligence Launch Nears 
ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes 
SpaceX Shares Surge as Wall Street Backs AI Growth Potential 
Bashar al-Assad Sentenced to Death by Syrian Court 
France Inflation Rises 2.4% in July as Consumer Prices Increase 
S&P 500 Retreats From Record High as AI Stocks Slide, Retail Sales Disappoint 
Judge Blocks Trump Mail Voting Order Ahead of 2026 Midterms 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Samsung Electronics has been ordered to pay computer-memory company Netlist more than $303 million by a federal jury in Marshall, Texas for infringing several data processing patents.
After a 6-day trial, the jury determined that Samsung's "memory modules" for high-performance computing infringed all five Netlist patents that the Korean tech giant supposedly.
Netlist sued Samsung in 2021, alleging Samsung memory products used in cloud-computing servers and other data-intensive technology infringed on its patents.
The Irvine, California-based Netlist said its innovations increase the power efficiency of memory modules and allowed access to vast amounts of data in a shorter period.
According to a Netlist attorney, Samsung took its patented module technology after the companies had collaborated on another project.
Samsung insists that Netlist’s patents were invalid and that its technology worked in a different way than Netlist's inventions.
Netlist had asked for $404 million in damages.
