Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
JD.com Pledges 22 Billion Yuan Housing Support for Couriers as China’s Instant Retail Competition Heats Up 
United Airlines Flight to Tokyo Returns to Dulles After Engine Failure During Takeoff 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
Malaysia Airlines Ordered to Compensate Families of MH370 Passengers 
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk 
Samsung SDI Secures Major LFP Battery Supply Deal in the U.S. 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority 
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe 
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute 
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation 
GameStop Misses Q3 Revenue Estimates as Digital Shift Pressures Growth 
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
Voting technology firm Smartmatic has been charged in U.S. federal court in Florida with money laundering and foreign bribery, marking a major development in an ongoing investigation into alleged corruption tied to elections in the Philippines. Federal prosecutors named Smartmatic’s parent company, SGO Corp, as a defendant in the case, which also includes three former executives accused of paying bribes between 2015 and 2018 to secure government contracts.
According to prosecutors, the executives allegedly funneled $1 million in bribes to a former Philippine election official using a slush fund created through inflated invoices for voting machines used in the 2016 Philippine elections. These payments were reportedly disguised in financial documents through coded language.
Smartmatic, however, denied all allegations, describing the charges as “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” The company stated that it has cooperated extensively with investigators and accused prosecutors of being “politically influenced by powerful interests.” Smartmatic vowed to contest the charges and expressed confidence that it would be cleared.
Among those charged is Smartmatic president and co-founder Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, who, along with other defendants, has pleaded not guilty. Pinate called the indictment legally deficient and asked the court to dismiss it. Federal prosecutors in Miami have not commented on the case.
The indictment comes as Smartmatic is also pursuing a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation and several commentators, alleging that Fox falsely claimed Smartmatic’s machines rigged the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox has denied wrongdoing, asserting that its coverage was protected by the First Amendment and constituted fair reporting on a matter of public concern.
This case intensifies scrutiny on election technology companies and raises broader questions about transparency, governance, and political influence in global election systems.
