States Sue Trump Administration Over SNAP Restrictions for Legal Immigrants 
Intel Boosts Malaysia Operations with Additional RM860 Million Investment 
Nexperia Urges China Division to Resume Chip Production as Supply Risks Mount 
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
ExxonMobil to Shut Older Singapore Steam Cracker Amid Global Petrochemical Downturn 
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Enforcing New Conditions on DHS Grants 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Coupang Apologizes After Massive Data Breach Affecting 33.7 Million Users 
Netflix’s Bid for Warner Bros Discovery Aims to Cut Streaming Costs and Reshape the Industry 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
USPS Expands Electric Vehicle Fleet as Nationwide Transition Accelerates 
Voting technology firm Smartmatic has been charged in U.S. federal court in Florida with money laundering and foreign bribery, marking a major development in an ongoing investigation into alleged corruption tied to elections in the Philippines. Federal prosecutors named Smartmatic’s parent company, SGO Corp, as a defendant in the case, which also includes three former executives accused of paying bribes between 2015 and 2018 to secure government contracts.
According to prosecutors, the executives allegedly funneled $1 million in bribes to a former Philippine election official using a slush fund created through inflated invoices for voting machines used in the 2016 Philippine elections. These payments were reportedly disguised in financial documents through coded language.
Smartmatic, however, denied all allegations, describing the charges as “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” The company stated that it has cooperated extensively with investigators and accused prosecutors of being “politically influenced by powerful interests.” Smartmatic vowed to contest the charges and expressed confidence that it would be cleared.
Among those charged is Smartmatic president and co-founder Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, who, along with other defendants, has pleaded not guilty. Pinate called the indictment legally deficient and asked the court to dismiss it. Federal prosecutors in Miami have not commented on the case.
The indictment comes as Smartmatic is also pursuing a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation and several commentators, alleging that Fox falsely claimed Smartmatic’s machines rigged the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox has denied wrongdoing, asserting that its coverage was protected by the First Amendment and constituted fair reporting on a matter of public concern.
This case intensifies scrutiny on election technology companies and raises broader questions about transparency, governance, and political influence in global election systems.
