Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for Austal US Business 
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026 
US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Trump Media Says Truth API Draws 10+ Customers as Conflict Concerns Grow 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook 
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned 
Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported 
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors 
AI Avatar of Jair Bolsonaro Sparks Legal Battle Ahead of Brazil’s 2026 Presidential Election 
Palantir Stock Soars as AI Demand Drives Strong Q2 Earnings and Higher 2026 Outlook 
Telegram Restored on Apple App Store After Temporary Removal 
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants 
Nvidia Seen Beating Q2 Targets as Vera Rubin Cycle Begins 
Meta Cuts Wipro Outsourcing by 25% After AI-Led Restructuring 
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report 
Voting technology firm Smartmatic has been charged in U.S. federal court in Florida with money laundering and foreign bribery, marking a major development in an ongoing investigation into alleged corruption tied to elections in the Philippines. Federal prosecutors named Smartmatic’s parent company, SGO Corp, as a defendant in the case, which also includes three former executives accused of paying bribes between 2015 and 2018 to secure government contracts.
According to prosecutors, the executives allegedly funneled $1 million in bribes to a former Philippine election official using a slush fund created through inflated invoices for voting machines used in the 2016 Philippine elections. These payments were reportedly disguised in financial documents through coded language.
Smartmatic, however, denied all allegations, describing the charges as “wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.” The company stated that it has cooperated extensively with investigators and accused prosecutors of being “politically influenced by powerful interests.” Smartmatic vowed to contest the charges and expressed confidence that it would be cleared.
Among those charged is Smartmatic president and co-founder Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, who, along with other defendants, has pleaded not guilty. Pinate called the indictment legally deficient and asked the court to dismiss it. Federal prosecutors in Miami have not commented on the case.
The indictment comes as Smartmatic is also pursuing a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation and several commentators, alleging that Fox falsely claimed Smartmatic’s machines rigged the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox has denied wrongdoing, asserting that its coverage was protected by the First Amendment and constituted fair reporting on a matter of public concern.
This case intensifies scrutiny on election technology companies and raises broader questions about transparency, governance, and political influence in global election systems.
