US Federal Register Drops Alibaba Qwen AI Search Tool 
FAA Allows Boeing to Sell 35 More 777F Freighters Beyond 2028 
Gold Prices Rise as Oil Slump Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears 
Petrobras Joins Brazil Diesel Subsidy Program 
Vietnam, US Trade Deal Could Be Signed Soon, To Lam Says 
Oil Prices Rise as Houthi Strikes on Riyadh Fuel Middle East Tensions 
NASA, Boeing Discuss Expanding Starliner Missions 
Asia Stocks Rise on AI Demand as Oil Eases 
U.S. Dollar Hits Eight-Week High After Fed Rate Hike 
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Sue Trump Over White House Media Ban 
South Korea to Brief Lawmakers on $350 Billion US Investment Package 
Yen Weakens as Dollar Gains on Widening US-Japan Rate Gap 
Mexico Pushes for US Trade Deal Before Midterms 
Nike Earnings at Risk as UBS Cuts Price Target to $42 
Japan, U.S. Discuss $19 Billion GlobalFoundries Chip Plant 
Meta Partners With Shopify to Bring Shop Pay Checkout to Muse AI 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Starbucks Corporation has a new battle to face in court after a federal judge said this week that a lawsuit filed by customers could proceed. The suit is about a complaint that says the coffee chain's Refresher fruit drinks have no real fruits in them.
The customers said fruits are the key ingredient in the drinks, but these are missing in the beverages served. U.S. District Judge John Cronan of Manhattan decided that the lawsuit may continue after rejecting Starbucks' request for the dismissal of nine of the 11 claims in class-action suits.
The judge explained that he made the decision because a significant number of reasonable customers would surely expect fruits in their drinks, as mentioned in their names. For instance, the Starbucks Mango Dragonfruit is expected to have real mango and dragonfruit in it.
According to Reuters, Starbucks customers complained that none of the coffee chain's Refresher drinks, including Mango Dragonfruit Lemonade, Pineapple Passionfruit Lemonade, Pineapple Passionfruit, Strawberry Açai Lemonade, and Strawberry Açai contain real mango, açai, or passion fruit.
They said the company has been promoting the beverages with fruits, but the actual drinks do not have them. The legal dispute that was filed in the New York District Court contended that Starbucks is charging extra for its Refreshers line of fruit drinks that are supposed to have water, fruit juice, and green coffee extract, but customers are not getting what they paid for.
The plaintiffs said customers were tricked into falsely thinking the fruity beverages had real mango and other fruits. In any case, the plaintiffs are Joan Kominis and Jason McAllister, and they are claiming that Starbucks' ads and names of the beverages are misleading and caused the overcharging of customers. McAllister and Kominis said through these offenses, the company violated the consumer protection laws.
Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported that Starbucks could not immediately respond to a request for a comment on the matter but in a statement to other publications, Starbucks said the claims are "inaccurate and without merit."
Photo by: The Nix Company/Unsplash
