The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to examine the legality of President Donald Trump’s directive aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, a move that could redefine a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment. The decision to hear the case follows a Justice Department appeal challenging a lower court ruling that blocked Trump’s order, which instructed federal agencies not to recognize citizenship for children born in the United States unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
The lower court concluded that the directive violated both the 14th Amendment and federal law, prompting a class-action lawsuit from affected families. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments this term, with a ruling anticipated by June. The executive order, signed on Trump’s first day of his second term, reflects his continued efforts to tighten both legal and illegal immigration—policies that have repeatedly sparked national debate and accusations of discrimination.
For more than a century, the 14th Amendment has been widely interpreted to guarantee citizenship to nearly all babies born on U.S. soil. However, the Trump administration contends that this protection should not extend to children of undocumented immigrants or individuals in the country temporarily, such as students or workers on visas. Supporters of the policy argue it addresses issues like illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism,” while critics maintain that no president has the authority to alter constitutional guarantees.
Challengers emphasize that the Supreme Court settled the matter in the 1898 Wong Kim Ark case, affirming that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents are citizens. They also cite federal laws that codify this longstanding interpretation. The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case before lower appeals courts weighed in underscores its national importance.
This ruling could significantly impact immigration law, federal authority, and the future of birthright citizenship in America.


Trump Vows Pardon for Former Honduran President as Honduras Faces Tight Election
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case
Meta Accused of Halting Internal Research on Mental Health Risks of Facebook and Instagram
U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits
Cuba Quietly Signals Openness to Post-Maduro Venezuela as U.S. Pressure Intensifies
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears
Trump Backs Review of U.S. Childhood Vaccine Schedule After Hepatitis B Policy Change
U.S. Appeals Court Rules Trump Can Remove Members of Key Federal Labor Boards
Trump Administration Tightens H-1B Visa Vetting With New Focus on Free Speech and Censorship
Peru’s Ex-President Martín Vizcarra Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Corruption
Netanyahu Requests Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial
Honduras Election Turmoil Intensifies as Nasralla Blames Trump for Shift in Results
UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns 



