A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico
Judge Approves Anthropic’s $1.5 Billion AI Copyright Settlement With Authors
US Expects Iran-Oman Hormuz Shipping Deal Soon
Mark Carney Jokes About Teleprompter, Takes Swipe at Trump
Trump Administration to Ban Chinese Robots, Power Inverters Over AI Security Concerns
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned
Trump Election Order Blocked Again as Appeals Court Rejects Mail-In Voting Push in 23 States
ICE to Complete Nationwide Body Camera Rollout by End of August
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief
US Supreme Court Lets $655.5 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Stand During Appeal
Senate Majority Leader John Thune Moves to Advance Crypto Clarity Act
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas
Brazil Supreme Court Tightens Jair Bolsonaro House Arrest Ahead of Election
Civil Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Childcare Funding Freeze and Influencer's Role
Bezalel Smotrich Faces Election Battle as Israel’s Far-Right Vote Fractures
New Zealand MMP Electoral System Faces Fresh Referendum Debate
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 



