A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Australia Launches Public Hearings on Bondi Beach Shooting and Rising Antisemitism
FEMA Reinstates Employees After Dissent Letter, Signaling Shift in Workforce Stability
Federal and State Authorities Conduct Widespread Fraud Raids Across Minnesota
US Sanctions Target Iran’s Shadow Banking Network and Terror Financing
Trump Administration Dismisses Entire National Science Board, Sparking Debate Over Scientific Independence
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects
Russia Downs Over 50 Drones Near Moscow Ahead of Victory Day Ceasefire
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case
Justice Jackson Slams Supreme Court's Growing Use of Shadow Docket
Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit
Google Secures Pentagon AI Deal for Classified Projects
U.S. Flags Vietnam as “Priority Foreign Country” Over Intellectual Property Concerns
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political
Trump and IRS in Settlement Talks Over $10 Billion Tax Return Leak Lawsuit
Pope Leo Calls for Peace as Vatican Seeks Better Ties With U.S.
Trump Announces Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire for May 9-11 Amid Ongoing Peace Talks
Trump Expands Cuba Sanctions Targeting Key Sectors and Foreign Entities 



