A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


OpenAI Faces Scrutiny After Banning ChatGPT Account of Tumbler Ridge Shooting Suspect
U.S. Plans 4,500 Monthly Refugee Admissions for White South Africans Amid Policy Debate
Nepal General Election 2026: Youth Protests, Political Change, and a New Generation of Voters
European Allies Deploy Air Defenses to Cyprus After Drone Attack on RAF Akrotiri Base
Rubio Says U.S. Would Not Target School After Deadly Iran Strike Reports
Democrats Warn Trump’s China Tech Security Pause Threatens U.S. National Security
Does international law still matter? The strike on the girls’ school in Iran shows why we need it
Pentagon Downplays ‘Endless War’ Fears After U.S. Strikes on Iran Escalate Conflict
Medical Groups Sue FTC Over Gender-Affirming Care Investigations Amid Trump Policy Dispute
Israel-Hezbollah Escalation Deepens Lebanon’s Role in Middle East Conflict
Defense Contractors Move to Drop Anthropic AI After Trump Administration Ban
FedEx Sues U.S. Government for Refund of Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs After Supreme Court Ruling
Trump Orders Federal Agencies to Halt Use of Anthropic AI Technology
Iran Detains U.S. Citizens Amid Escalating Conflict With the United States and Israel
Denver Mayor Orders Police to Protect Protesters, Restricts ICE Access to City Property 



