A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Trump Revises U.S. Tariffs on Copper, Aluminum, and Steel Imports Through 2027
Trump Says Anthropic No Longer Seen as National Security Threat
Australia Eases Capital Gains Tax Reforms to Support Small Businesses and Startups
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures
Marco Rubio Says U.S. Will Block IRGC-Linked Individuals From Iran World Cup Delegation
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court
US Launches New Trade Investigation Into Vietnam Over Intellectual Property Concerns
Colombia Opens New Investigation Into Former President Álvaro Uribe Over Paramilitary Allegations
Trump Lawyers Face Scrutiny After Missing Deadline in $10 Billion BBC Defamation Lawsuit
South Korea Ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol Sentenced to 30 Years Over Martial Law Plot
Trump Administration Plans Deportation of Iranian Migrants to Central African Republic Under New Third-Country Deal
Meta Challenges Australia’s Proposed Tech Tax, Citing U.S. Trade Agreement Concerns
US to Accelerate Troop Withdrawal from Europe, NATO Allies to Review Plans Next Month
Trump Signs Executive Order to Expand Access to Federal Lands in the U.S.
RFK Jr. Orders Extended Hantavirus Quarantine for Cruise Passenger
Australia Sues 3M for Over A$2 Billion Over PFAS Firefighting Foam Contamination 



