A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
RFK Jr. Overhauls Federal Autism Panel, Sparking Medical Community Backlash
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Paul Atkins Emphasizes Global Regulatory Cooperation at Fintech Conference
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 



