Steam currently has an explicit refund policy in place detailing the conditions that would allow customers to ask for their money back after buying games. However, it would seem that this was not always the case since the policy wasn’t formalized until 2014. In the years prior to that, customers weren’t sure if they were eligible or not. As a result, Valve is being fined by a court in Australia worth $3 million.
Australia has a strict legal system designed to protect its consumers, which Valve decided to ignore back in 2014 by not issuing refunds to customers, iTechPost reports. As a result, the giant digital video game retailer and the nation down under clashed over the validity of claims by customers as well as Valve’s defense of its refusal to give their money back.
It was a legal battle that lasted for two years, but it would seem that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) finally won. Initially, Valve asked the court to set the fee at a modest $250,000, which was immediately struck down. The judge in charge of the case even said that such an amount wouldn’t even make a blip on Valve’s radar, which makes hundreds of millions in video game sales. As a result, the fine was increased twelve-fold.
According to Gamezone, it’s the fact that Steam didn’t have clear refund policy back in 2014 that really made the case by ACCC against Valve. On the company’s part, it would seem that it didn’t even seek legal advice before launching in the country, which turned out was a huge mistake.
In any case, the company has since been ordered to add a link on its homepage that would lead to a page where at least fourteen explicit items relating to the refund policy of Steam will be explained in detail. The refund policy items should also conform to Australian law.


SpaceX Seeks FCC Approval for Massive Solar-Powered Satellite Network to Support AI Data Centers
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
Sam Altman Reaffirms OpenAI’s Long-Term Commitment to NVIDIA Amid Chip Report
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Apple Earnings Beat Expectations as iPhone Sales Surge to Four-Year High
DOJ Urges Judge to Block Lawmakers’ Bid for Special Master in Jeffrey Epstein Records Case
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Failure to Provide Full Voter Registration Records
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
SoftBank and Intel Partner to Develop Next-Generation Memory Chips for AI Data Centers
Sandisk Stock Soars After Blowout Earnings and AI-Driven Outlook
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 



