Apple Inc faced a setback on Wednesday as it failed to block a massive lawsuit in London. The lawsuit alleges that the tech giant concealed defective batteries in millions of iPhones.
The case, worth up to $2 billion, was brought by British consumer champion Justin Gutmann on behalf of approximately 24 million iPhone users in the United Kingdom. This legal battle seeks damages of up to 1.6 billion pounds ($1.9 billion) plus interest. However, Apple refuted the claims, stating they were baseless, according to Reuters.
Concealed Issues and Throttled Performance
According to Gutmann's lawyers, Apple resorted to concealing battery issues in certain iPhone models. They alleged that the company deliberately "throttled" performance through software updates and installed a power management tool to limit performance.
Despite Apple's denial of defective batteries, except for a few iPhone 6s models, where they offered free battery replacements, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled in favor of Gutmann's case.
The CAT acknowledged "a lack of clarity and specificity" in Gutmann's case that needs resolution before proceeding to trial. The court also raised concerns about Gutmann's litigation funding arrangements following a recent Supreme Court ruling that rendered many such agreements unlawful.
These issues, however, did not hinder the CAT's decision to allow the case to proceed, marking a significant step towards consumer justice, as Gutmann declared.
Apple's Denial and Continuing Litigation
Yahoo reported that an Apple spokesperson reiterated their previous statement, expressing that they have never intentionally shortened the life of any Apple product or degraded the user experience to drive customer upgrades.
The CAT's emphasis on resolving litigation funding arrangements reflects the recent Supreme Court ruling that has prompted a reevaluation of such agreements. This signifies evolving changes in the legal landscape and the need to ensure fair and just proceedings for all parties involved.
The certification of Gutmann's case joins a growing list of high-value mass lawsuits in London's courts. This trend emerged following the approval of claims against major banks for foreign exchange rigging. As more consumers seek justice against alleged corporate misconduct, the expertise of London's legal system is being widely utilized.
Apple's strong denial and defense against the lawsuit highlights the potential implications for the tech industry. The outcome of this case could impact how companies address product issues and communicate with their user base. The resolution of this legal battle may significantly influence consumer trust and confidence.
Photo: Sophia Stark/Unsplash


Intel Rejects TSMC’s Allegations of Trade-Secret Leaks as Legal Battle Escalates
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case
IKEA Launches First New Zealand Store, Marking Expansion Into Its 64th Global Market
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup
TSMC Accuses Former Executive of Leaking Trade Secrets as Taiwan Prosecutors Launch Investigation
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities
Baidu Cuts Jobs as AI Competition and Ad Revenue Slump Intensify
Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro to Begin 27-Year Prison Term
Netflix’s Bid for Warner Bros Discovery Aims to Cut Streaming Costs and Reshape the Industry
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Apple Appoints Amar Subramanya as New Vice President of AI Amid Push to Accelerate Innovation
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 



