DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Freelancer Over North Korea Military Report 
Milei Pushes for Formula 1 Return to Argentina 
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal 
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case 
Judge Blocks Trump Mail Voting Order Ahead of 2026 Midterms 
US Supreme Court Lets $655.5 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Stand During Appeal 
Syria, Israel Resume US-Mediated Security Talks in Jordan 
SEC Sues Former Tricolor Executives Over $1.9 Billion Investor Fraud Scheme 
New Zealand Labour Backs Social Media Ban for Under-16s 
Iran Allows Iraqi Oil Tankers Through Strait of Hormuz 
US Weighs New Sanctions Against Brazil Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes 
Canada Announces Dollar-for-Dollar Retaliation Against 50% U.S. Tariffs 
U.S. Unleashes New Iran Sanctions, Targets Oil, Crypto and Trade Networks 
Prince Harry, Elton John Ordered to Pay £9.54 Million in Daily Mail Legal Costs 
29 US states are suing Meta. What might it mean for the rest of the world? 
Peru Court Frees Former President Ollanta Humala After Conviction Overturned 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Five Democratic-led states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) froze their access to more than $10 billion in federal childcare and family assistance funds. The legal challenge, filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan by California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, argues that the funding freeze is unlawful, politically motivated, and harmful to low-income families who rely on federal support programs.
The dispute began after HHS announced on Tuesday that it had restricted the states’ access to federal funds pending further review, citing concerns over alleged fraud and misuse in state-administered welfare systems. The frozen funding includes approximately $7.3 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, nearly $2.4 billion from the Child Care and Development Fund, and an additional $869 million in social services block grants. These programs are overseen by the Administration for Children and Families, a division within HHS.
According to the agency, the decision was based on what it described as “widespread fraud” and the potential that individuals who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may have improperly received benefits. The action follows a similar move a week earlier, when HHS froze $185 million in annual childcare funding allocated to Minnesota amid allegations of fraud in the state’s social services programs.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term, stating that he intends to focus on addressing the fraud controversy. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders across the affected states have strongly criticized the funding freeze. New York Governor Kathy Hochul labeled the move “vindictive,” while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker described it as “wrong and cruel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, said the administration is using essential family assistance funds as a political weapon. The lawsuit claims HHS failed to provide credible evidence supporting its fraud allegations, lacked legal authority to halt congressionally approved funding, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on Congress’s control over federal spending.
