Five Democratic-led states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) froze their access to more than $10 billion in federal childcare and family assistance funds. The legal challenge, filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan by California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, argues that the funding freeze is unlawful, politically motivated, and harmful to low-income families who rely on federal support programs.
The dispute began after HHS announced on Tuesday that it had restricted the states’ access to federal funds pending further review, citing concerns over alleged fraud and misuse in state-administered welfare systems. The frozen funding includes approximately $7.3 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, nearly $2.4 billion from the Child Care and Development Fund, and an additional $869 million in social services block grants. These programs are overseen by the Administration for Children and Families, a division within HHS.
According to the agency, the decision was based on what it described as “widespread fraud” and the potential that individuals who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may have improperly received benefits. The action follows a similar move a week earlier, when HHS froze $185 million in annual childcare funding allocated to Minnesota amid allegations of fraud in the state’s social services programs.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term, stating that he intends to focus on addressing the fraud controversy. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders across the affected states have strongly criticized the funding freeze. New York Governor Kathy Hochul labeled the move “vindictive,” while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker described it as “wrong and cruel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, said the administration is using essential family assistance funds as a political weapon. The lawsuit claims HHS failed to provide credible evidence supporting its fraud allegations, lacked legal authority to halt congressionally approved funding, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on Congress’s control over federal spending.


Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Could Expand as Ukraine Peace Talks Continue, Says Treasury Secretary Bessent
NATO to Discuss Strengthening Greenland Security Amid Arctic Tensions
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Marco Rubio Steps Down as Acting U.S. Archivist Amid Federal Law Limits
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 



