Five Democratic-led states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) froze their access to more than $10 billion in federal childcare and family assistance funds. The legal challenge, filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan by California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, argues that the funding freeze is unlawful, politically motivated, and harmful to low-income families who rely on federal support programs.
The dispute began after HHS announced on Tuesday that it had restricted the states’ access to federal funds pending further review, citing concerns over alleged fraud and misuse in state-administered welfare systems. The frozen funding includes approximately $7.3 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, nearly $2.4 billion from the Child Care and Development Fund, and an additional $869 million in social services block grants. These programs are overseen by the Administration for Children and Families, a division within HHS.
According to the agency, the decision was based on what it described as “widespread fraud” and the potential that individuals who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may have improperly received benefits. The action follows a similar move a week earlier, when HHS froze $185 million in annual childcare funding allocated to Minnesota amid allegations of fraud in the state’s social services programs.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term, stating that he intends to focus on addressing the fraud controversy. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders across the affected states have strongly criticized the funding freeze. New York Governor Kathy Hochul labeled the move “vindictive,” while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker described it as “wrong and cruel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, said the administration is using essential family assistance funds as a political weapon. The lawsuit claims HHS failed to provide credible evidence supporting its fraud allegations, lacked legal authority to halt congressionally approved funding, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on Congress’s control over federal spending.


CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 



