President Donald Trump is known for attacking his political enemies on Twitter, and later on, signed an executive order on social media sites. Now, a new lawsuit has come up against the order, claiming that it violates the first amendment.
The Verge reports that the Center for Democracy and Technology or the CDT, who filed the lawsuit, claimed that Trump’s Executive Order was done in retaliation of Twitter’s use of the First Amendment right to be able to moderate the messages Trump posts on the social media site. As Trump’s order attacked Twitter, the CDT further reasoned that this would end up keeping social media platforms from exercising its rights to free speech nor moderate Trump’s posts in fear of retaliation.
“The President has made clear that his goal is to use threats and retaliation and future regulation to intimidate intermediaries into changing how they moderate content, essentially ensuring that the dangers of voter suppression and disinformation will grow unchecked in an election year,” said the CDT CEO Alexandra Givens in a statement.
The signing of the Executive Order comes as a few of Trump’s tweets regarding mail-in voting and voter fraud were placed under a fact-check tag. The tags linked to articles from news outlets clarifying the facts on these issues that Trump has accused several states (and the Democrats) of. By the end of May, Twitter restricted another tweet from Trump for violation of its policies of glorifying violence.
Among the social media sites that would be included in this Executive Order was Facebook. CEO Mark Zuckerberg previously spoke out against Twitter’s fact-checking policy in an interview, saying that their platforms are not in the position to do such actions. However, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey responded that it is their responsibility to also show the facts for people to be able to discern the truth for themselves. But Zuckerberg’s decision not to take any action on Trump’s Facebook post that is threatening to shoot looters has earned him backlash from civil rights leaders.
The activist leaders; Vanita Gupta, Sherrilyn Ifill, and Rashad Robison expressed their disappointment towards Zuckerberg, and said that the Facebook CEO is setting a very dangerous precedent for other people who would post harmful things on the platform. This statement came after they met with Zuckerberg and Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg on Monday.


Lebanon Resists Iran Pressure as Israel-Hezbollah Ceasefire Talks Stall
Anthropic Officials Meet White House Over AI Model Outage
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Law Enforcement Mask Ban
IMF Advances Ukraine Loan Program, Clears $690M Disbursement
France Hosts Israeli-Palestinian Civil Society Appeal to Revive Two-State Solution Ahead of G7 Summit
JCPOA Nuclear Deal Explained as U.S. Nears Potential New Iran Peace Agreement
US Plans NATO Force Reduction in Europe Amid Defense Burden Dispute
Senior Haitian Security Official Kidnapped as Gang Violence Escalates in Port-au-Prince
Trump Opposes FISA Renewal Without SAVE Act Voting Requirement
Lazard Challenges Centerview for Role in Venezuela’s Massive Debt Restructuring
E4 Nations Signal Readiness to Lift Iran Sanctions Following U.S.-Iran Peace Deal
U.S.-Iran Peace Framework Nears as Strait of Hormuz Reopening Takes Center Stage
US-Iran Peace Deal Nears as Tehran and Pakistan Signal Breakthrough
Mitch McConnell Hospitalized After Medical Incident in Washington
Trump Announces Iran Deal, Strait of Hormuz Reopening Amid Ongoing Regional Tensions
Viktor Orban Re-Elected as Fidesz Leader After Election Defeat
North Korea Slams U.S. Missile Sale to South Korea, Warns of Rising Regional Tensions 



