Tencent Shares Fall as $5 Billion AI Bond Sale Weighed 
Apple Supplier Luxshare Sees Limited Impact From US Patent Probe 
US Suspends Microsoft, Adobe From Green Card Program 
Arthur Hayes Announces FLOP Testnet Launch Within Weeks 
OpenAI Revenue Hits $50 Billion, Below Earlier $70 Billion Estimate 
Apple Cuts iPhone 18 Pro Production Orders Amid Weak Demand 
Samsung, SK Hynix Shares Fall as China's CXMT Advances DRAM Technology 
Oracle Uses Trucked Natural Gas to Power AI Data Centers Amid Pipeline Delays 
Jameson Lopp Downplays AI Threat to Bitcoin Cryptography 
Nvidia’s China AI Chip Market Share Falls to 34% as Huawei Gains Ground 
Zcash Plans Quantum-Resistant Security Upgrade for January 
Trump Buys Up to $25M in Meta Stock, Invests in SpaceX Debt 
OpenAI Annualized Revenue Hits $50 Billion, Below Earlier Estimates 
Moonshot AI Executives Seek Settlement Ahead of Hong Kong IPO 
Epic Games Delays Disney Shooter, Shifts to AI-First Development 
Elon Musk Eyes Semiconductor Manufacturing Expansion With $15 Billion Terrafab Project 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Even though the Exynos 2400 trails the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in synthetic benchmark tests by a small margin, the two CPUs appear to be neck and neck in real-world gaming settings.
Exynos 2400 Can Keep Up With Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 In Actual Games
NL Tech compared the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra versus the Exynos 2400-powered Samsung Galaxy S24+ with a variety of popular Android games to determine whether there was any difference.
The results are pretty startling, to say the least. The two devices performed similarly in Genshin Impact, PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends, and Fortnite. In Gehnshin, the two chips maintained approximately 60fps; in PUBG Mobile at Smooth graphics settings, the two maintained 90fps; and in Fortnite, the consistent frame rate was around 90fps, occasionally decreasing to 70fps during fighting.
NL Tech found a substantial difference in only two games: "Call of Duty: Mobile" and "War Thunder." During the former, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 maintained 120fps throughout the game, however the Exynos 2400 was limited to 60fps for some reason.
In "War Thunder," however, the Exynos 2400 surpassed Qualcomm's solution by sustaining a frame rate of roughly 100fps while the Snapdragon throttled to 40. It's worth noting that "War Thunder" supports ray tracing. Therefore, these findings indicate that Exynos' Xclipse 940 GPU is better suited to handling ray tracing visuals, as per GSMArena.
Exynos 2400's Thermal Efficiency: Bridging Performance with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in Galaxy S24 Series
It's vital to remember a few things here. First, the testing was conducted on pre-production handsets, and second, they are two distinct phones. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is said to have a better cooling solution, including a larger heat sink.
Other factors may be at play in this case. It would be intriguing to see a Samsung Galaxy S24+ with Exynos competing with its Snapdragon-powered sibling.
What's fantastic about the Exynos 2400 is that it doesn't overheat like previous-generation Exynos chips, and the temperatures of the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Samsung Galaxy S24+ look to be comparable to those of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
The Exynos 2400 performed similarly to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 For Galaxy inside the Galaxy S24 Ultra, both in terms of frame rates and temperatures. It could be a mix of the Exynos 2400's enhanced design, the newer Xclipse 940 GPU (based on AMD RDNA3), Samsung Foundry's third-generation 4nm chip production process, and a larger vapor chamber cooling system.
Photo: NL Tech/YouTube Screenshot
