Hyundai CEO Warns Chinese Automakers Could Disrupt US Market 
Databricks to Invest $350 Million in Singapore AI Expansion 
Trump Plans Federal AI Force and AI Czar 
Japan, U.S. Discuss $19 Billion GlobalFoundries Chip Plant 
US Northeast Airports Resume Operations After Telecom Outage Disrupts Thousands of Flights 
Guterres Urges Stronger Global AI Safeguards Ahead of UN Assembly 
SoftBank Shares Jump 8% as SB Energy IPO Optimism Builds 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Expected at Trump-Xi State Dinner 
Westinghouse Targets $50 Billion Valuation in U.S. IPO 
SK Hynix, Intel Discuss U.S. Memory Chip Production Deal 
Meta Partners With Shopify to Bring Shop Pay Checkout to Muse AI 
Big AI wants to slow down AI research. Is it a safety pause or a strategic retreat? 
SpaceX Nasdaq 100 Weight to More Than Double in Rebalance 
France Urges Faster AI Push Despite Safety Risks 
Who should own the knowledge that underpins AI technology? 
Burnham Eyes UK Leadership Role in AI Ahead of Trump Meeting 
Physicists zoom into the birth of cosmic rainstorms with new CERN study 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Even though the Exynos 2400 trails the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in synthetic benchmark tests by a small margin, the two CPUs appear to be neck and neck in real-world gaming settings.
Exynos 2400 Can Keep Up With Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 In Actual Games
NL Tech compared the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra versus the Exynos 2400-powered Samsung Galaxy S24+ with a variety of popular Android games to determine whether there was any difference.
The results are pretty startling, to say the least. The two devices performed similarly in Genshin Impact, PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends, and Fortnite. In Gehnshin, the two chips maintained approximately 60fps; in PUBG Mobile at Smooth graphics settings, the two maintained 90fps; and in Fortnite, the consistent frame rate was around 90fps, occasionally decreasing to 70fps during fighting.
NL Tech found a substantial difference in only two games: "Call of Duty: Mobile" and "War Thunder." During the former, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 maintained 120fps throughout the game, however the Exynos 2400 was limited to 60fps for some reason.
In "War Thunder," however, the Exynos 2400 surpassed Qualcomm's solution by sustaining a frame rate of roughly 100fps while the Snapdragon throttled to 40. It's worth noting that "War Thunder" supports ray tracing. Therefore, these findings indicate that Exynos' Xclipse 940 GPU is better suited to handling ray tracing visuals, as per GSMArena.
Exynos 2400's Thermal Efficiency: Bridging Performance with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in Galaxy S24 Series
It's vital to remember a few things here. First, the testing was conducted on pre-production handsets, and second, they are two distinct phones. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is said to have a better cooling solution, including a larger heat sink.
Other factors may be at play in this case. It would be intriguing to see a Samsung Galaxy S24+ with Exynos competing with its Snapdragon-powered sibling.
What's fantastic about the Exynos 2400 is that it doesn't overheat like previous-generation Exynos chips, and the temperatures of the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Samsung Galaxy S24+ look to be comparable to those of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
The Exynos 2400 performed similarly to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 For Galaxy inside the Galaxy S24 Ultra, both in terms of frame rates and temperatures. It could be a mix of the Exynos 2400's enhanced design, the newer Xclipse 940 GPU (based on AMD RDNA3), Samsung Foundry's third-generation 4nm chip production process, and a larger vapor chamber cooling system.
Photo: NL Tech/YouTube Screenshot
