Ukraine Begins Major POW Swap as 205 Soldiers Return from Russian Captivity 
U.S. Urges China to Help Curb Iran’s Actions in Gulf, Rubio Says 
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis 
U.S. Army Soldier Charged in $400K Insider Betting Scheme on Maduro Capture 
US Plans Imminent Indictment of Cuba’s Raul Castro Over 1996 Plane Shootdown 
Russian Border Drone Attack Leaves One Dead in Belgorod Region 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
Trump Administration Files Fraud Charges Against Southern Poverty Law Center Over Informant Payments 
Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit 
Trump Administration Seeks Court Pause to Reinstate 10% Global Tariffs 
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political 
Japan Considers Extra Budget Aid Amid Rising Fuel and Utility Costs 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
Macron Faces Political Test Over Bank of France Nomination Ahead of 2027 Election 
Pentagon Halts Planned U.S. Troop Deployment to Poland Amid Europe Force Review 
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case 
US-China Trade Talks Sideline Chip Export Controls as Nvidia China Sales Draw Attention 
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from withholding roughly $80 million in federal funding used to administer Minnesota’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, amid a legal dispute over alleged fraud and eligibility reviews.
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino ruled during a hearing in St. Paul that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) likely acted illegally by giving Minnesota only 30 days, until January 15, to review the eligibility of about 100,000 SNAP households. The USDA had warned it would stop reimbursing half of the state’s administrative costs if the deadline was not met, citing concerns over widespread fraud linked to social-welfare programs in Minnesota.
Judge Provinzino said the USDA failed to justify why such an accelerated review was necessary and noted that federal law generally prohibits states from reviewing SNAP recipients’ eligibility more than once per year. She added that Minnesota’s existing operational plan, which limits reviews, had already been approved by the USDA. In her ruling, the judge stated that the federal agency appeared to be pushing the state to violate federal law and its own regulations.
The court order prevents the USDA from withholding the disputed funding while the lawsuit proceeds, including approximately $20 million for the first quarter of the year that the agency had indicated would not be released. The ruling does not affect the monthly SNAP benefits paid directly to recipients, which will continue uninterrupted.
Minnesota officials argued the USDA’s actions were politically motivated, pointing to President Donald Trump’s long-running conflicts with Democratic leaders in the state, including Governor Tim Walz. State attorneys said the funding threat was part of a broader pattern of federal pressure against Minnesota.
The U.S. Department of Justice countered that Minnesota’s past issues with other federally funded programs justified the USDA’s response and claimed the state could temporarily cover the shortfall with its own funds.
SNAP has remained a contentious issue nationally, particularly during Trump’s presidency. The program serves low-income Americans earning less than 130% of the federal poverty level, with maximum monthly benefits in fiscal year 2026 set at $298 for one person and $546 for a two-person household.
