GS Retail Co. has been fined KRW24.4 billion or around $18.7 million, due to unfair practices related to its business dealings with contractors. South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission (FTC) revealed on Tuesday, Aug. 2, that it decided to penalize the supermarket chain company that operates GS25 convenience stores in the country.
As per Yonhap News Agency, aside from the hefty fine, GS Retail Co. was also slapped with a correction order for violations of the “Act on Fair Subcontract Transactions” (Subcontract Act). This means that the FTC also demanded for the company to correct its unfair practices when dealing with its contracted fresh food suppliers.
The anti-trust regulators determined that the company received a total of KRW19.5 billion from eight of its contractors or suppliers for what GS Retail said are for promotion costs and other fees that were collected between November 2016 and September 2019.
The contractors likely agreed as the company entrusted them with the manufacturing of its own brand of fresh food products such as gimbap, rice rolls, and sandwiches which were sold at its convenience store outlets. The FTC explained that GS Retail collected KRW6.87 billion in performance incentives from the mentioned period, and this was carried out without any justifiable reasons.
The commission did not see any valid reason for GS Retail to receive such fees from its subcontractors. This is because the performance incentives are normally the money handed out by suppliers to distributors to encourage them to buy their own products.
It was added that GS Retail also collected a similar fee amounting to KRW2.74 billion from suppliers in the months between February 2020 and April 2021. And again, the FTC said this was obtained without proper reasons.
With the findings, the FTC ruled that the GS25 convenience store operator violated the Subcontracting Act, which prohibits retailers from asking contractors to give economic returns without valid justifications.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that provision fees are not required as the contractors just followed GS Retail’s routine manufacturing instructions. It was noted that these suppliers mainly rely on the supermarket chain company to keep their business going. Finally, in response to FTC’s decision, GS Retail is considering filing an appeal as it expresses regret for the outcome of the investigation that was launched in 2019.


BOJ Expected to Deliver December Rate Hike as Economists See Borrowing Costs Rising Through 2025
Russia Stocks End Flat as Energy and Retail Shares Show Mixed Performance
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies
Mexico Moves to Increase Tariffs on Asian Imports to Protect Domestic Industries
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise
China’s November Economic Data Signals Slowing Industrial Output and Weak Consumer Demand
Asian Currencies Hold Steady as Indian Rupee Slides to Record Low on Fed Outlook
Asian Stocks Slide as Central Bank Decisions and Key Data Keep Investors Cautious
HSBC’s $13.6 Billion Take-Private Offer for Hang Seng Bank Gains Board Backing
SoftBank Eyes Switch Inc as It Pushes Deeper Into AI Data Center Expansion
Coca-Cola’s Proposed Sale of Costa Coffee Faces Uncertainty Amid Price Dispute
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles
South Korea Extends Bond Market Stabilization Measures Amid Rising Financial Risks
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
Dollar Struggles as Markets Eye Key Central Bank Decisions and Global Rate Outlooks
Fortescue Expands Copper Portfolio With Full Takeover of Alta Copper 



