Taiwan Political Standoff Deepens as President Lai Urges Parliament to Withdraw Disputed Laws 
Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices 
Ukraine Claims First-Ever Underwater Drone Strike on Russian Missile Submarine 
Trump Weighs Reclassifying Marijuana as Schedule III, Potentially Transforming U.S. Cannabis Industry 
U.S. Offers NATO-Style Security Guarantees to Ukraine as Peace Talks Show Progress 
Sydney Bondi Beach Shooting Sparks Calls for Stronger Protection of Jewish Community in Australia 
European Leaders Tie Ukraine Territorial Decisions to Strong Security Guarantees 
Lukashenko Says Maduro Welcome in Belarus Amid Rising U.S.-Venezuela Tensions 
Thousands Protest in Brazil Against Efforts to Reduce Jair Bolsonaro’s Prison Sentence 
Belarus Frees Opposition Leaders Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka in U.S.-Brokered Deal 
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
Syria Arrests Five Suspects After Deadly Attack on U.S. and Syrian Troops in Palmyra 
Trump Administration Moves to Keep TransAlta Coal Plant Running Amid Rising AI Power Demand 
U.S. Suspends UK Technology Deal Amid Trade Disputes Under Trump Administration 
Hong Kong Democratic Party Disbands After Member Vote Amid Security Crackdown 
Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan initially cooperated with the Jan. 6 Committee investigating the Capitol insurrection only to later walk back on his cooperation. According to a former FBI agent, Jordan may refuse to cooperate now, but it is not over yet for the Ohio congressman.
Speaking on MSNBC, former FBI agent Peter Strzok explained that Jordan’s refusal to cooperate with the Jan. 6 committee does not mean that Jordan will never cooperate to some extent. The Ohio congressman initially cooperated with the committee, following the text messages from Mark Meadows that revealed Jordan as one of its authors.
However, likely at the instruction of Donald Trump, Jordan later reversed his decision, joining Rep. Scott Perry in refusing to cooperate with the panel.
Strzok explained that Congress has an obligation to get to the truth of the Capitol insurrection and noted that congressional probes are different from the parallel criminal investigation that is being conducted by the DOJ.
Strzok said that while Jordan’s refusal to comply with the committee may be to satisfy the GOP’s leader and the base, should he be faced with a grand jury subpoena by the DOJ, Jordan would have different things to consider.
“And again, refusing to comply isn’t an option. Now, he certainly could invoke the Fifth Amendment and claim he doesn’t want to engage in any sort of statement which might incriminate himself. But there are a number of things going on right now that just because we see the Jan. 6 committee ask for him to voluntarily speak and he declines to do so, that doesn’t mean this debate is over. This doesn’t mean at all that Jim Jordan, for all intents and purposes, is never going to provide or speak to the truth or what he did on the days leading up to and on Jan. 6,” said Strzok.
Following Jordan’s now-refusal to comply, Rep. Jamie Raskin, who serves on the committee, referred Jordan to his own words during the Benghazi hearings that Republicans held. Raskin quoted Jordan’s statement from the final Benghazi report, where the Ohio Republican said that all of the truth must be revealed and no one has the right to withhold information from Congress.
Raskin revealed that the panel has not yet discussed what it plans to do with Jordan, whether he would be immediately referred to the DOJ or would be served a subpoena.
