White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries 
Zelensky Urges Faster NATO Action on Air Defense Missiles 
US Expects Iran-Oman Hormuz Shipping Deal Soon 
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas 
AI Data Center Boom Faces New Risks as Public Backlash and Policy Scrutiny Grow 
Trump Orders Probe Into Pentagon Munitions Stockpile Leaks After Iran Conflict 
US Customs Inspects China-Linked Factories in Vietnam Amid Trade Compliance Review 
Brazil Rejects Visas for Trump Officials Ahead of Presidential Election 
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts 
US Watchdog Finds State Department Struggled After USAID Shutdown Takeover 
Ukraine Agrees to Protect Kazakhstan Oil Exports via Black Sea 
Taiwan President Lai Oversees Coastal Strike Drills in Han Kuang War Games 
California ICE Detention Center Found to Have Inadequate Medical Care, Court Monitor Says 
Maduro U.S. Drug Trafficking Trial Set for June 2027 as Immunity Defense Looms 
Russia Charges Telegram Founder Pavel Durov With Facilitating Terrorism, Seeks International Arrest 
Samsung, SK Hynix Test AMEC Chipmaking Tools for China Backup Plan 
Trump Orders Section 301 Probe Into EU Tech Fines, Signals New Tariffs 
A U.S. federal judge ruled the government violated a court order by attempting to deport six migrants to South Sudan without adequate notice, intensifying tensions between the judiciary and President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
Judge Brian Murphy said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defied his April injunction, which required officials to give migrants a chance to voice safety concerns before being deported to a third country. DHS gave less than 24 hours' notice before loading the migrants onto a plane—deemed “plainly insufficient” by Murphy, who mandated a 10-day notice period moving forward.
The six deportees, from countries including Cuba, Laos, and Myanmar, had been convicted of serious crimes. Still, immigrant rights groups argue that deporting them to war-torn South Sudan without due process violates constitutional protections.
The Biden-appointed judge criticized the DHS for ignoring court directives and warned of possible criminal contempt charges. Despite pressure, Murphy allowed the DHS to keep the migrants abroad for now but required 72-hour interview notice and 15 days to appeal if deportation fears are dismissed.
The White House called Murphy a "far-left activist judge," and DHS described his ruling as "deranged," sparking backlash. Trump advisor Stephen Miller claimed Murphy endangered personnel by interfering with national security.
This case mirrors other legal clashes, including Judge Boasberg’s paused contempt probe over deported Venezuelans and Judge Xinis’s unresolved case involving a deported Maryland resident.
Advocates argue Trump’s immigration crackdown disregards legal norms, with courts repeatedly stepping in to ensure due process. As South Sudan authorities suggest re-deporting the men, Murphy demanded a declaration explaining how U.S. actions comply with international legal standards.
This ruling underscores the legal limits facing Trump’s renewed deportation push amid broader constitutional debates.
