SpaceX IPO Sets Record With $75 Billion Raise, Valuation Hits $1.77 Trillion 
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions 
oOh!media Takeover Battle Intensifies as Bain Capital Joins Competing Bids 
Qualcomm Stock Gains After Jensen Huang Endorsement 
Apple Unveils Enhanced Apple Intelligence and Next-Generation Siri at WWDC 2026 
Bouygues, Orange and Iliad Strike €20.35 Billion Deal to Acquire SFR 
Meta Delays Release of New AI Model as API Rollout Remains Uncertain 
SK Hynix Stock Rebounds as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Expansion Plans 
Quantinuum Raises $1.68 Billion in Upsized Nasdaq IPO Amid Growing Quantum Computing Demand 
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit 
Meta Challenges Australia’s Proposed Tech Tax, Citing U.S. Trade Agreement Concerns 
Exxon Mobil Set to Appoint Alex Volkov as Global Trading Chief 
Asics Considers Onitsuka Tiger Spinoff as Luxury Sneaker Brand Expands Globally 
Meta AI Strategy Faces Challenges as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes in Internal Memo 
Hanmi Semicon Shares Surge After $33 Million SpaceX Investment 
Apollo and Blackstone Complete $35 Billion Anthropic AI Infrastructure Financing Deal 
BHP Port Hedland Workers Back Strike Action Amid Pay Dispute 
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard have responded to the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission that aims to block its $68.7 billion merger. It was revealed in the filing that Sony has refused to accept a proposal that involves “Call of Duty.”
The companies maintained that the deal would allow Xbox to compete better in the gaming industry while emphasizing that Xbox is lagging behind PlayStation and Nintendo in the console market. Microsoft also stressed that the merger would help Microsoft establish a bigger presence in the mobile gaming space. The filing (via CNBC) noted that mobile gaming makes up 75% of Activision’s customers and more than a third of its revenue.
As expected, Microsoft and Activision reiterated that they do not intend to remove “Call of Duty” from any platform where it currently exists. “The reputational hit to Xbox would not be worth any theoretical economic benefit from taking Call of Duty away from competitors,” the response reads.
Upon announcing its lawsuit against the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard merger last Dec. 8, the FTC said in a press release that Microsoft “would have means and motive to harm competition” if the deal pushes through. The FTC is concerned that, aside from possibly removing “Call of Duty” on PlayStation, Microsoft could also manipulate prices and the quality of Activision Blizzard games on non-Xbox platforms.
Meanwhile, the filing also revealed that Sony “refused” a proposal Microsoft offered concerning the future availability of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation. Xbox’s parent company first said last month that it proposed an agreement with Sony that would guarantee “Call of Duty” games will be released on the PlayStation system for 10 years.
Earlier this month, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer announced that it entered a similar deal with Nintendo, which would bring Activision’s blockbuster first-person shooter franchise to its console for the first time. Microsoft also relayed the same offer to Valve, which owns the PC digital store Steam. Valve CEO Gabe Newell confirmed it, adding that Microsoft sent them a draft agreement, but deemed it unnecessary.
In a statement to Kotaku, Newell said Valve does not believe in requiring partners to sign agreements to guarantee games are released on Steam. “Phil and the games team at Microsoft have always followed through on what they told us they would do so we trust their intentions,” Newell added.
FTC's lawsuit against Microsoft and Activision Blizzard merger will be heard by its Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell, in August 2023. And if the deal is ultimately blocked, Microsoft would have to pay Activision Blizzard a break up fee between $2 billion to $3 billion.
Photo by Kārlis Dambrāns from Flickr under Creative Commons (CC BY 2.0)
