Anthropic Eyes $6B Decart AI Acquisition Ahead of Mega IPO 
OpenAI Executive Brad Lightcap to Leave for New AI Venture 
Apple Develops China-Specific AI Model With Alibaba as Apple Intelligence Launch Nears 
Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast 
Alphabet Shifts AI Strategy Toward Commercial Growth, Goldman Sachs Says 
Nvidia Eyes $3 Billion Investment in SoftBank-Backed AI Data Center 
Bernstein Picks BYD and Xiaomi as Top China EV Stocks Despite Weaker Demand 
SMIC Shares Rally as Q2 Profit Surges 262% on Strong Chip Demand 
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges 
ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes 
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake 
Paramount Skydance Clears Regulatory Hurdles for Warner Bros. Discovery Deal 
LG, Nvidia Expand AI Partnership With Humanoid Robots, AI Factories 
Paramount Weighs CNN Sale as $110B Warner Bros. Discovery Deal Faces Antitrust Fight 
Goldman Sachs Eyes Investors for Nvidia’s $500 Billion AI Financing Plan 
Apple Tests China’s CXMT Memory Chips for iPhones and MacBooks Amid AI Supply Crunch 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard have responded to the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission that aims to block its $68.7 billion merger. It was revealed in the filing that Sony has refused to accept a proposal that involves “Call of Duty.”
The companies maintained that the deal would allow Xbox to compete better in the gaming industry while emphasizing that Xbox is lagging behind PlayStation and Nintendo in the console market. Microsoft also stressed that the merger would help Microsoft establish a bigger presence in the mobile gaming space. The filing (via CNBC) noted that mobile gaming makes up 75% of Activision’s customers and more than a third of its revenue.
As expected, Microsoft and Activision reiterated that they do not intend to remove “Call of Duty” from any platform where it currently exists. “The reputational hit to Xbox would not be worth any theoretical economic benefit from taking Call of Duty away from competitors,” the response reads.
Upon announcing its lawsuit against the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard merger last Dec. 8, the FTC said in a press release that Microsoft “would have means and motive to harm competition” if the deal pushes through. The FTC is concerned that, aside from possibly removing “Call of Duty” on PlayStation, Microsoft could also manipulate prices and the quality of Activision Blizzard games on non-Xbox platforms.
Meanwhile, the filing also revealed that Sony “refused” a proposal Microsoft offered concerning the future availability of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation. Xbox’s parent company first said last month that it proposed an agreement with Sony that would guarantee “Call of Duty” games will be released on the PlayStation system for 10 years.
Earlier this month, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer announced that it entered a similar deal with Nintendo, which would bring Activision’s blockbuster first-person shooter franchise to its console for the first time. Microsoft also relayed the same offer to Valve, which owns the PC digital store Steam. Valve CEO Gabe Newell confirmed it, adding that Microsoft sent them a draft agreement, but deemed it unnecessary.
In a statement to Kotaku, Newell said Valve does not believe in requiring partners to sign agreements to guarantee games are released on Steam. “Phil and the games team at Microsoft have always followed through on what they told us they would do so we trust their intentions,” Newell added.
FTC's lawsuit against Microsoft and Activision Blizzard merger will be heard by its Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell, in August 2023. And if the deal is ultimately blocked, Microsoft would have to pay Activision Blizzard a break up fee between $2 billion to $3 billion.
Photo by Kārlis Dambrāns from Flickr under Creative Commons (CC BY 2.0)
