Moonshot Launches Kimi K3, China's Largest Open-Source AI Model 
SpaceX Q2 Earnings on Aug. 4 Set Stage for Historic Insider Share Unlock 
Alaska Air Q3 Outlook Misses Estimates as Higher Fuel Costs Weigh on Profit Forecast 
Cathay Pacific Sees H1 Profit Surge on Strong Travel Demand 
Lockheed Martin Unveils Lower-Cost Patriot ACE Interceptor to Meet Rising Air Defense Demand 
Bank of America Says These Overlooked AI Stocks Could Be the Next Winners 
Hyundai Takes Full Control of Boston Dynamics to Accelerate Humanoid Robot and AI Strategy 
Morgan Stanley Downgrades Adobe, Workday as AI Transition Raises Growth Concerns 
Jamie Dimon Warns Anthropic's Mythos AI Poses National Security Risks 
Australia ASIC Tightens Auditor Oversight After KPMG Leak Scandal 
Samsung Eyes Up to $1.14 Billion Investment in AI Startup Mistral 
ASML Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Can Europe’s AI Chip Giant Reach the Historic Milestone? 
Samsung Biologics Launches $1.81 Billion Bid to Acquire PolyPeptide 
US, China to Hold AI Talks Ahead of Xi’s September Visit 
Belimo H1 Sales Surge as AI Data Center Cooling Drives More Than Half of Growth 
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard have responded to the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission that aims to block its $68.7 billion merger. It was revealed in the filing that Sony has refused to accept a proposal that involves “Call of Duty.”
The companies maintained that the deal would allow Xbox to compete better in the gaming industry while emphasizing that Xbox is lagging behind PlayStation and Nintendo in the console market. Microsoft also stressed that the merger would help Microsoft establish a bigger presence in the mobile gaming space. The filing (via CNBC) noted that mobile gaming makes up 75% of Activision’s customers and more than a third of its revenue.
As expected, Microsoft and Activision reiterated that they do not intend to remove “Call of Duty” from any platform where it currently exists. “The reputational hit to Xbox would not be worth any theoretical economic benefit from taking Call of Duty away from competitors,” the response reads.
Upon announcing its lawsuit against the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard merger last Dec. 8, the FTC said in a press release that Microsoft “would have means and motive to harm competition” if the deal pushes through. The FTC is concerned that, aside from possibly removing “Call of Duty” on PlayStation, Microsoft could also manipulate prices and the quality of Activision Blizzard games on non-Xbox platforms.
Meanwhile, the filing also revealed that Sony “refused” a proposal Microsoft offered concerning the future availability of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation. Xbox’s parent company first said last month that it proposed an agreement with Sony that would guarantee “Call of Duty” games will be released on the PlayStation system for 10 years.
Earlier this month, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer announced that it entered a similar deal with Nintendo, which would bring Activision’s blockbuster first-person shooter franchise to its console for the first time. Microsoft also relayed the same offer to Valve, which owns the PC digital store Steam. Valve CEO Gabe Newell confirmed it, adding that Microsoft sent them a draft agreement, but deemed it unnecessary.
In a statement to Kotaku, Newell said Valve does not believe in requiring partners to sign agreements to guarantee games are released on Steam. “Phil and the games team at Microsoft have always followed through on what they told us they would do so we trust their intentions,” Newell added.
FTC's lawsuit against Microsoft and Activision Blizzard merger will be heard by its Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell, in August 2023. And if the deal is ultimately blocked, Microsoft would have to pay Activision Blizzard a break up fee between $2 billion to $3 billion.
Photo by Kārlis Dambrāns from Flickr under Creative Commons (CC BY 2.0)
