This year’s recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize spoke out against the ongoing war that Russia is waging on Ukraine, which is moving toward its 10th month. The recipients sent a strong, unified message but had some differences in their condemnation of Russian leader Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin.
This year’s Nobel Peace Prize award recipients went to jailed Belarusian activist Ales Bialiatski, the Russian human rights organization Memorial and the Ukrainian Center for Civil Liberties. Bialiatski’s wife Natallia Pinchuk accepted the award on his behalf during the ceremony in Oslo that takes place every December 10, the day that Alfred Nobel died in 1896.
“Ales and we all realize how important and risky it is to fulfill the mission of civil rights defenders – especially in the tragic time of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine,” Pinchuk told Al Jazeera.
Oleksandra Matviichuk of the Ukraine Center for Civil Liberties dismissed the calls for Russia to keep the supposedly annexed parts of Ukraine in a political compromise.
“Fighting for peace does not mean yielding to pressure of the aggressor, it means protecting people from its cruelty,” said Matviichuk. “Peace cannot be reached by a country under attack laying down its arms. This would not be peace, but occupation.”
Jan Rachinsky of Memorial said that the current state of civil society in Russia is a reflection of its own “unresolved past.” Rachinsky ripped into the Kremlin’s efforts to denigrate Ukraine’s history, statehood, and independence, as well as that of former Soviet Union countries, saying that it turned into the Kremlin’s “justification for the insane and criminal war of aggression against Ukraine.”
The British defense ministry on Monday issued its latest intelligence bulletin, noting the previous comments made by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov regarding Moscow’s intentions for the war. The ministry said that the goals appear to be unchanged.
The ministry said that Moscow is still likely looking to control the four regions it claims to have annexed: Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia and that Russian military planners are likely looking to prioritize further advancing into Donetsk.
However, the ministry said that Russia may fail to achieve its goals as the Russian military appears unable to “generate an effective striking force” that could recapture the four areas.


Trump and Xi Temple of Heaven Visit Highlights Trade and Diplomacy Goals
Dulles Airport Rebuild Plan Could Transform Washington’s Main International Gateway
Trump Says Iran Ceasefire ‘On Life Support’ as Oil Prices Surge Above $104
Russia Resumes Heavy Drone Attacks on Ukraine After Ceasefire Ends
US, Japan Reaffirm Strong Currency Coordination Amid Yen Volatility
Israel Approves Special Military Tribunal for Hamas October 7 Attack Suspects
South Korea Reviews Phased Support for Strait of Hormuz Security Efforts
US-China Trade Talks Begin in South Korea Ahead of Trump-Xi Beijing Summit
Trump Weighs Renewed Military Action Against Iran Amid Strait of Hormuz Crisis
Trump Administration’s National Science Board Dismissal Sparks Warning From Scientists
Trump Signals Possible U.S.-Cuba Talks Amid Rising Pressure on Havana
Florida to Close “Alligator Alcatraz” Migrant Detention Center Amid Criticism
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to Join Trump’s China Visit Amid AI Chip Tensions
New Zealand Budget 2026 Focuses on Fiscal Discipline and Infrastructure Investment
Tennessee Republicans Remove Democrats From Committees After Redistricting Protest
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case
Saudi Arabia’s Secret Strikes on Iran Reveal Escalating Middle East Conflict 



