Private Credit Under Pressure: Is a Slow-Motion Crisis Unfolding? 
UPS and Teamsters Reach Agreement to Limit Driver Severance Program 
OpenAI Executive Shake-Up Ahead of Anticipated 2026 IPO 
LG Electronics Posts Record Q1 Revenue Amid Strong Demand and Cost Improvements 
Elon Musk Ties SpaceX IPO Access to Mandatory Grok AI Subscriptions 
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute 
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition 
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 
Samsung Electronics Posts Eightfold Profit Surge Driven by AI Chip Demand 
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk 
Nike Beats Q3 Estimates but China Weakness and Margin Pressure Weigh on Outlook 
First Western Ship Transits Strait of Hormuz Since Iran War Began 
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure 
MATCH Act Targets ASML and Chinese Chipmakers in New U.S. Export Crackdown 
Pershing Square Bids €30.40 Per Share to Acquire Universal Music Group in $9.4B Deal 
Ford Issues Major Recall on Over 422,000 Vehicles Due to Windshield Wiper Defect 
TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028 
IRVINE, Calif., Sept. 18, 2017 -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Lexmark International Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: LXK). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lexmark shares from August 1, 2014 through July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm by September 19, 2017, the lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased Lexmark shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at [email protected].
There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member as well.
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors. On July 21, 2015, the Company reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price fell materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected].
This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Contact
Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
[email protected]
