Rio Tinto Reports Strong Q2 Iron Ore Sales, Maintains 2026 Production Outlook 
United Airlines Beats Q2 Earnings, Raises 2026 Profit Outlook Despite Higher Fuel Costs 
Apple Intelligence Cleared for China as Alibaba and Baidu AI Power iPhone Features 
SEB Q2 Profit Rises on Strong Lending, Record Fee Income, Announces New Share Buyback 
Yaskawa Electric Shares Slide as Weak Profit Overshadows Strong AI Demand 
BHP Faces Major Port Hedland Strike as Labor Talks Stall Ahead of Production Report 
SpaceX Stock Falls Below IPO Price as Investors Weigh Losses and Lockup Expiry 
Genesis Minerals to Acquire Vault in A$5.6 Billion Deal After Regis Withdraws 
Arm Stock Falls After HSBC Downgrade, Citing Limited Near-Term AI Upside 
UBS Boosts China Tech Bets, Adds Kuaishou and Meituan to Focus List 
Stripe, Advent Offer Over $53 Billion to Acquire PayPal in Major Fintech Deal 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
DBS Targets S$1 Trillion Wealth AUM by 2030 Amid Asia Wealth Boom 
DeepSeek Eyes China IPO as AI Startup Seeks $71 Billion Valuation in New Funding Round 
Alibaba Stock Jumps as China Approves Apple Intelligence Powered by Qwen AI 
Taiwan Mangoes Head to Europe as Premium Fruit Exports Expand 
Jamie Dimon Warns Anthropic's Mythos AI Poses National Security Risks 
WILMINGTON, Del., Jan. 22, 2016 -- Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
- Do you, or did you, own shares of Ooma Inc. (NYSE:OOMA)?
- Did you lose money in your investment?
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that a complaint (the “Complaint”) has been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Ooma Inc. (“Ooma” or the “Company”) (NYSE:OOMA) pursuant to the July 2015 initial public offering (“IPO”) of the Company’s stock.
The Complaint alleges that Ooma failed to disclose certain material information in the Registration Statement issued in connection with the IPO. Specifically, it is alleged that Ooma failed to disclose that certain large prior fiscal year sales to its largest outside reseller were not recurring; that the rate of customer terminations and failures to renew had increased significantly due to significant service outages in the Spring of 2015; and that technological issues in the Company’s lead generation business caused leads to get lost before they reached their intended targets.
As a consequence of these adverse factors, Ooma’s stock lost approximately half its value since the IPO, trading at approximately $6.50 per share, compared to its IPO price of $13 per share.
If you suffered a loss in Ooma and would like to obtain additional information, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail at [email protected]; or at http://rigrodskylong.com/investigations/ooma-inc-ooma/.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
CONTACT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire Peter Allocco (888) 969-4242 (516) 683-3516 Fax: (302) 654-7530 [email protected] http://www.rigrodskylong.com
