Japan’s Nikkei Drops as Markets Await Key U.S. Inflation Data 
Northwestern University to Restore Research Funding Under $75 Million Agreement with U.S. Government 
Mexico Probes Miss Universe President Raul Rocha Over Alleged Criminal Links 
Drones Spotted Near Zelenskiy’s Flight Path in Ireland Trigger Security Alert 
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges 
Dollar Slides to Five-Week Low as Asian Stocks Struggle and Markets Bet on Fed Rate Cut 
Oil Prices Hold Steady as Ukraine Tensions and Fed Cut Expectations Support Market 
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case 
Australia Progresses AUKUS Review as U.S. Affirms Strong Support 
Afghan Suspect in Deadly Shooting of National Guard Members Faces First-Degree Murder Charge 
Maduro Confirms “Respectful” Call With Trump, Signals Openness to Diplomatic Dialogue 
BOJ Governor Ueda Highlights Uncertainty Over Future Interest Rate Hikes 
Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro to Begin 27-Year Prison Term 
China’s Expanding Maritime Military Presence Alarms Taiwan and Japan 
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Hong Kong Faces Low Turnout in “Patriots-Only” Election Amid Public Grief After Deadly Fire 
New Orleans Immigration Crackdown Sparks Fear as Federal Arrests Intensify 
A South Korean district court branch ordered the sale of confiscated assets of Nippon Steel Corp. to compensate four Korean plaintiffs in a wartime forced labor lawsuit.
The court seized the assets located in South Korea after Nippon Steel failed to pay damages to plaintiffs who were found by the Supreme Court in October 2018 to have been forced to work for Japan Iron & Steel Co., Nippon Steel’s forerunner, in the 1940s.
A similar ruling was made against Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. in September.
Nippon Steel is highly likely to appeal, just like Mitsubishi Heavy did, which is expected to take considerable as the case could reach the top court.
Nippon Steel did not comply with the court’s compensation order, saying that the issue of claims stemming from the 1910-1945 colonial rule was settled in 1965 under a bilateral accord.
The plaintiffs had a portion of the Japanese company’s shares in POSCO-Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture seized via the court.
In May, they asked the court to order the sale of the shares.
If the assets are liquidated, it will likely deal another blow to bilateral relations.
Japan protested to South Korea after the court order against Mitsubishi Heavy last September, warning that liquidating the seized assets “would invite a grave situation” for both countries.
Japan urged South Korea to “immediately take appropriate measures,” adding it was violating international law.
