A federal judge has rejected a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, delivering a significant win for the administration’s immigration policy agenda. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled that the fee falls within the president’s broad authority to regulate immigration, dismissing arguments from major U.S. business and academic groups.
The lawsuit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, along with the Association of American Universities. The groups argued that the Trump administration overstepped its legal authority when it issued a September proclamation imposing the steep fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They claimed the measure would harm U.S. businesses, universities, and the broader economy by making it more difficult and expensive to attract global talent.
Judge Howell disagreed, concluding that existing immigration laws grant the president wide discretion to set conditions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States. In her ruling, she emphasized that Congress has historically delegated significant power to the executive branch in matters related to immigration and national borders. As a result, the court found that the administration acted within its legal rights when it implemented the H-1B visa fee.
The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare, and academia. Supporters of the fee argue it helps protect American jobs and ensures that companies prioritize domestic workers. Critics, however, warn that the policy could discourage innovation, increase labor shortages, and reduce the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and research institutions.
The ruling marks an important development in ongoing debates over U.S. immigration policy, skilled worker visas, and executive authority. While opponents may consider further legal action or legislative solutions, the decision reinforces the Trump administration’s ability to use immigration tools, including fees and restrictions, to shape labor and economic policy.


Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
Trump Rejects Putin’s New START Extension Offer, Raising Fears of a New Nuclear Arms Race
RFK Jr. Overhauls Federal Autism Panel, Sparking Medical Community Backlash
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Paul Atkins Emphasizes Global Regulatory Cooperation at Fintech Conference
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges 



