A federal judge has rejected a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, delivering a significant win for the administration’s immigration policy agenda. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled that the fee falls within the president’s broad authority to regulate immigration, dismissing arguments from major U.S. business and academic groups.
The lawsuit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, along with the Association of American Universities. The groups argued that the Trump administration overstepped its legal authority when it issued a September proclamation imposing the steep fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They claimed the measure would harm U.S. businesses, universities, and the broader economy by making it more difficult and expensive to attract global talent.
Judge Howell disagreed, concluding that existing immigration laws grant the president wide discretion to set conditions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States. In her ruling, she emphasized that Congress has historically delegated significant power to the executive branch in matters related to immigration and national borders. As a result, the court found that the administration acted within its legal rights when it implemented the H-1B visa fee.
The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare, and academia. Supporters of the fee argue it helps protect American jobs and ensures that companies prioritize domestic workers. Critics, however, warn that the policy could discourage innovation, increase labor shortages, and reduce the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and research institutions.
The ruling marks an important development in ongoing debates over U.S. immigration policy, skilled worker visas, and executive authority. While opponents may consider further legal action or legislative solutions, the decision reinforces the Trump administration’s ability to use immigration tools, including fees and restrictions, to shape labor and economic policy.


Boeing Seeks FAA Emissions Waiver to Continue 777F Freighter Sales Amid Strong Cargo Demand
NSW Passes Toughest Gun and Anti-Terror Laws After Bondi Beach Shooting
Netanyahu to Raise Iran Nuclear Concerns in Upcoming Meeting With Trump
Trump Administration Recalls Nearly 30 U.S. Ambassadors in Push for “America First” Agenda
Seatrium Reaches $475 Million Settlement With Maersk Over Offshore Wind Vessel Project
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling
Trump Taps Former DHS Official Troy Edgar for U.S. Ambassador Role in El Salvador
Italy Fines Apple €98.6 Million Over App Store Dominance
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland
Epstein Files Released by DOJ Spotlight Bill Clinton, Raise Questions Over Trump Mentions
Brazil Court Allows Bolsonaro Hospital Trip Amid Prison Sentence
Democratic Attorneys General Sue Trump Administration Over Proposed Limits on Gender-Affirming Care for Youth
Trump Administration Proposes Sweeping Limits on Gender-Affirming Care for Children
DOJ Reaches Settlement With Blackstone’s LivCor Over Alleged Rent Price-Fixing
U.S. Signs $2.3 Billion Global Health MOUs With Four African Nations 



