A federal judge has rejected a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, delivering a significant win for the administration’s immigration policy agenda. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled that the fee falls within the president’s broad authority to regulate immigration, dismissing arguments from major U.S. business and academic groups.
The lawsuit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, along with the Association of American Universities. The groups argued that the Trump administration overstepped its legal authority when it issued a September proclamation imposing the steep fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They claimed the measure would harm U.S. businesses, universities, and the broader economy by making it more difficult and expensive to attract global talent.
Judge Howell disagreed, concluding that existing immigration laws grant the president wide discretion to set conditions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States. In her ruling, she emphasized that Congress has historically delegated significant power to the executive branch in matters related to immigration and national borders. As a result, the court found that the administration acted within its legal rights when it implemented the H-1B visa fee.
The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare, and academia. Supporters of the fee argue it helps protect American jobs and ensures that companies prioritize domestic workers. Critics, however, warn that the policy could discourage innovation, increase labor shortages, and reduce the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and research institutions.
The ruling marks an important development in ongoing debates over U.S. immigration policy, skilled worker visas, and executive authority. While opponents may consider further legal action or legislative solutions, the decision reinforces the Trump administration’s ability to use immigration tools, including fees and restrictions, to shape labor and economic policy.


UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Trump Appoints Colin McDonald as Assistant Attorney General for National Fraud Enforcement
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Pentagon and Anthropic Clash Over AI Safeguards in National Security Use
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 



