The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to weaken one of the nation’s most important civil rights laws — the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Enacted under President Lyndon B. Johnson and championed by Martin Luther King Jr., the law outlawed racial discrimination in voting. Now, nearly 60 years later, its Section 2, which prohibits voting practices that dilute minority voting power, faces a serious threat.
The latest challenge stems from Louisiana, where Black residents make up one-third of the population. A Republican-led legislature added a second Black-majority congressional district after a court found the previous map violated Section 2. However, white voters sued, claiming the redrawn map placed too much emphasis on race and violated constitutional equal protection rights. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled support for curbing Section 2’s reach during arguments on Wednesday.
The Justice Department, echoing Trump-era arguments, proposed a framework giving states greater flexibility to prioritize “race-neutral” districting principles. Legal experts warn this approach could make proving racial discrimination in redistricting cases nearly impossible. George Washington University law professor Spencer Overton said such a ruling would “effectively gut” Section 2, allowing state legislatures to entrench partisan power and marginalize minority voters.
The Voting Rights Act, strengthened in 1982 by adding the “results test,” once served as a powerful tool against systemic discrimination. But the Supreme Court has gradually weakened it — notably in the 2013 Shelby County v. Holderdecision that ended federal oversight of states with histories of discrimination. Now, justices may further erode protections under the guise of constitutional colorblindness.
If the Court limits Section 2 enforcement, analysts say Republicans could gain up to 19 congressional seats, reshaping the political map. Civil rights advocates, including the ACLU, vow to continue the fight for fair representation and equal access to the ballot box, warning that this decision could define the future of U.S. democracy.


Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms 



