X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers 
Unilever Raises 2026 Sales Outlook After Strong Q2 Volume Growth 
BHP, Port Hedland Unions Fail to Reach Wage Deal as Negotiations Continue 
GSK Unveils $2.52 Billion Cost-Cutting Plan to Accelerate Drug Pipeline 
Exosens H1 Profit Beats Forecasts as Defense Demand Drives Growth 
Stellantis Sells Free2move Car-Sharing Business to Mutares to Strengthen Core Auto Strategy 
Rio Tinto Stock Jumps as Strong Earnings, Higher Dividend and AI Metal Demand Boost Outlook 
CATL Shares Jump as $5.6 Billion Buyback Signals Confidence in Long-Term Growth 
ASML, Applied Materials Slide as China DUV Chip Equipment Breakthrough Sparks Market Jitters 
Tech Stock Positioning Nears Neutral as Investor Rotation Enters Final Phase, Deutsche Bank Says 
TeamViewer Shares Fall Despite Profit Growth as ARR and Customer Base Decline 
Zabka Shares Drop 10% as Seven & i Abandons Investment Plans 
Brown-Forman Rejects Sazerac’s $15 Billion Takeover Bid as Family Backs Independence 
SK Hynix Q2 Profit Hits Record as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Growth 
Zhongji Innolight Raises $6.8 Billion in Hong Kong IPO as AI Demand Fuels Growth 
Sika Raises 2026 Sales Outlook After Strong First-Half Results Beat Expectations 
Standard Chartered Beats Profit Forecasts as First-Half Earnings Rise 9% 
Tiffany & Co is seeking a court order requiring LVMH to abide by its contractual obligation of completing a $16 billion takeover after the latter declared it would not be able to complete the deal.
LVMH declared that it would not be able to complete the acquisition of Tiffany as its board insists on sticking to the terms of the original merger agreement, which requires completion of the deal by Nov. 24.
The French group pointed out that Tiffany had asked it to postpone the closing of the deal to Dec. 31 of this year after already extending the deadline to Nov. 24.
LVMH added that they also received a letter from the French foreign ministry telling it to delay the Tiffany acquisition to beyond Jan. 6, 2021, due to the threat of additional US tariffs against French products.
Tiffany accused LVMH of deliberately stalling the deal, saying it was in breach of its obligations by delaying the procurement of an antitrust clearance.
Tiffany also rejected LVMH’s stance that it can avoid completing the acquisition since Tiffany had breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement and undergone a material adverse effect, or that the transaction is inconsistent with its patriotic duties to France.
The deal would have been the biggest in the luxury industry, but the pandemic badly impacted the luxury sector. There were also questions about whether the acquisition price was too high.
