Tim Hortons entered the South Korean market and opened its first store just last month in Gangnam district of Seoul. The second outlet immediately followed after two weeks and was launched in Seolleung Station in the same city.
Tim Hortons plans to expand further in the country and targets 150 locations in five years. However, less than a month after the first store was inaugurated, the Canadian coffee chain brand was already called out for allegedly overcharging its Korean customers.
Higher Menu Prices than Canada
According to The Korea Times, a customer named David Kim visited a Tim Hortons store in Korea, and he was surprised when he saw the menu prices. He was disappointed that a medium-sized cup of black coffee cost KRW3,900 or C$3.97.
Kim studied in Toronto, Canada, and buying coffee at Tim Hortons has been a habit. The brand became his favorite because the drinks and food are affordable. This was why he was surprised to see the prices in South Korea.
He paid KRW3,900 for the same coffee drink he usually buys in Tim Hortons Canada stores for just C$1.83. This amount shows a big difference of C$2.14 for a drink alone, and looking at the menu, he saw that everything is way more expensive in the Korean outlets.
"I was hugely disappointed," Kim explained, as he was expecting rates similar to those in Canada. "If Tim Hortons in Canada sold their double-double and French Vanilla at the same prices as here in Seoul, I would have never gone there and neither would local patrons there."
Controversial Local Pricing
Korea's SBS Business reported that Tim Hortons has gained popularity in Canada for being cheaper than others, although serving the same premium items. But in South Korea, it already drew flak a few weeks after opening its first store due to the discovery of a significant price difference. This led to the allegations that the coffee house was overcharging local customers in Korea.
In response to the criticisms, BKR, the local food franchise operator of Tim Hortons, explained, "We made the decision (pricing) after comprehensively reviewing the economy, market, needs, and operating costs of each country. However, even taking into account the fact that it is an overseas brand, the general reaction is that it is difficult to understand the (price) difference of almost 2 times."
Photo by: Danny Ouimet/Unsplash


China Adds MP Materials, USA Rare Earth to Export Control List Amid Escalating U.S.-China Trade Tensions
100+ Global Companies Push Governments to Prioritize Electrification for Economic Growth
Apollo Debt Solutions Limits Redemptions as Withdrawal Requests Surge
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks
Google’s Open-Source AI Data Center Cooling Design Raises Commoditization Concerns
Heineken Names JDE Peet’s CEO Rafael Oliveira as New Chief Executive
Trump Says Anthropic No Longer Seen as National Security Threat
Alphabet Stock Slides as AI Talent Exodus and SpaceX Losses Shake Investor Confidence
Ukrainian Drone Makers Target Japan and Asia Defense Market
Trump’s Quantum Push Lifts IBM Stock as CEO Arvind Krishna Receives White House Praise
TD Bank Expands Employee Monitoring Software to Boost Productivity Amid Privacy Concerns
KPMG Australia Chairman and Senior Partners Exit Amid Escalating Whistleblower Scandal
Qualcomm Nears $4 Billion Acquisition of AI Chip Startup Modular
J.P. Morgan Sees Potential Vestas Guidance Upgrade Amid Strong Wind Energy Demand
Baseten Secures $1.5 Billion Funding at $13 Billion Valuation Amid AI Infrastructure Boom
US-Iran De-Escalation Shifts Washington’s Focus to AI Regulation and Crypto Legislation 



