The Trump administration has escalated its campaign against Harvard University by launching two fresh federal investigations, intensifying an already fierce standoff between the White House and one of America's most prestigious academic institutions.
The U.S. Department of Education's civil rights office announced the probes, which will examine whether Harvard continues to use race-based preferences in admissions following the Supreme Court's landmark 2023 ruling that effectively ended affirmative action. A second investigation targets allegations of antisemitism on Harvard's campus, an issue that has become a central flashpoint in the administration's broader crackdown on elite universities.
Harvard firmly denied any wrongdoing, with a spokesperson stating the university remains fully compliant with federal admissions law and is deeply committed to combating antisemitism. The school characterized the new probes as retaliatory moves aimed at pressuring Harvard to abandon its institutional independence and constitutional rights.
This latest action adds to a growing pile of legal confrontations. The administration filed two separate lawsuits against Harvard earlier this year — one seeking billions of dollars over alleged failures to protect Jewish students, and another demanding compliance with a federal admissions data investigation. Privacy advocates and former Biden-era officials have warned that such data collection could be weaponized against civil rights protections.
Harvard is not alone in facing federal pressure. Columbia University recently reached a settlement with the Trump administration, agreeing to pay over $200 million — an arrangement that academic experts have criticized as setting a troubling "pay-to-play" precedent for higher education institutions.
Critics also note that while the administration has aggressively pursued antisemitism-related probes, it has not launched comparable investigations into Islamophobia or anti-Palestinian discrimination on college campuses, raising concerns about selective enforcement and political motivation behind the federal scrutiny.


US Tightens AI Chip Export Rules, Impacting Nvidia and AMD Sales to Chinese Firms
Gaza Ceasefire Talks Resume as Israeli Strike Kills Seven Palestinians
Kosovo Election 2026: Albin Kurti’s Party Wins Most Votes but Falls Short of Majority
Trump Forced Labour Tariff Plan Faces Criticism as Experts Question Effectiveness
Brazil Extends Fuel Subsidies and Tax Relief Measures Through July 2026 Amid Global Oil Market Volatility
US Sanctions M23 and FDLR Commanders Amid Ongoing Eastern Congo Conflict
Xi Jinping Visits North Korea as Kim Jong Un Strengthens Position with Russia and Nuclear Expansion
Gordie Howe International Bridge Set to Open, Boosting U.S.-Canada Trade Links
Italian Investigation Targets Israel’s Itamar Ben-Gvir Over Gaza Flotilla Activists
US Imposes Fresh Iran Oil Sanctions Despite Progress on Ceasefire Talks
US Quantum Stocks Surge After $2 Billion Government Investment
Princess Anne’s Son Peter Phillips Marries Harriet Sperling at Royal Wedding in England
US Expands Iran Sanctions, Targets Major Crypto Exchanges and Individuals
New World Screwworm Found Near U.S. Border Raises Threat to Cattle Industry and Beef Prices
Trump Urges Restraint as Israel-Iran Tensions Threaten Fragile Peace Talks
US Tightens Ebola Controls as Congo Outbreak Sparks Global Concern
Trump Revises U.S. Tariffs on Copper, Aluminum, and Steel Imports Through 2027 



