Faith Leaders Arrested on Capitol Hill During Protest Against Trump Immigration Policies and ICE Funding 
U.S. and El Salvador Sign Landmark Critical Minerals Agreement to Boost Investment and Trade 
Trump to Announce New Federal Reserve Chair Pick as Powell Replacement Looms 
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement 
Pierre Poilievre Retains Conservative Leadership After Election Defeat in Canada 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
U.S. Government Faces Brief Shutdown as Congress Delays Funding Deal 
Trump Warns UK and Canada Against Deepening Business Ties With China 
U.S. Eases Venezuela Oil Sanctions to Boost American Investment After Maduro Ouster 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation 
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery 
Venezuela Proposes Amnesty Law and Plans to Transform Helicoide Prison 
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law 
A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s attempt to freeze billions in climate and infrastructure grants initially approved under President Joe Biden’s administration. U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy in Rhode Island issued an injunction after environmental and nonprofit groups argued that pausing these funds violated federal law.
The blocked funds were part of two major legislative packages: the $1 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. These laws funded projects aimed at combating climate change, reducing pollution, and modernizing public infrastructure. The Trump administration attempted to pause the funding through an executive order on his first day back in office, calling for a review to align spending with his policy priorities.
Following the order, agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Housing and Urban Development suspended disbursements. The lawsuit—filed by the Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council, Eastern Rhode Island Conservation District, National Council of Nonprofits, and Green Infrastructure Center—contended that these agencies overstepped their authority by freezing already-awarded grants.
Judge McElroy ruled that federal agencies cannot unilaterally override Congress-approved funding or indefinitely delay implementation of statutory mandates. Advocacy group Democracy Forward, which led the legal effort, called the freeze an abuse of executive power threatening public health and environmental initiatives.
The Justice Department defended the administration’s position, citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision supporting Trump’s authority to cut teacher training grants as part of efforts to roll back diversity and equity programs. However, the court’s stance on jurisdiction in this case remains a point of legal contention.
This ruling marks a significant setback to Trump’s broader effort to redirect federal spending and reshape climate and infrastructure policies.
