Industry shutdowns are messy and painful: 4 lessons Australia’s coal sector can learn from car-makers about bowing out 
Women want to climb the corporate ladder — but not at any price 
Lotte Wellfood Brings Its Pepero Products to Thailand’s King Power Duty-Free Shop 
Evangelical bestsellers reveal diverse — and sometimes dangerous — ideas about morality 
The future of work: Why we must think beyond the hype of the four-day week 
Gen Z boys’ attitudes to feminism are more nuanced than negative 
Is attachment theory actually important for romantic relationships? 
Apple Pulls WhatsApp, Threads from China Store; US Moves to Force TikTok Sale 
How India’s economy has fared under ten years of Narendra Modi 
How the UK’s new rights around flexible working will affect employees and businesses 
What the Boeing whistleblower’s death reveals about exposing corporate wrongdoing in North America 
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that it was unlawful for Tesla to prohibit employees from wearing shirts bearing a union insignia.
In a 3-2 decision on a 2017 dispute between Tesla and the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union, the NLRB said that companies interfering with employees' rights to display union insignia have the burden of establishing special circumstances justifying it.
The majority found that the electric car maker failed to establish those special circumstances in this case.
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran said the decision reaffirms the presumptive unlawfulness of any attempt to restrict the wearing of union clothing or insignia.
A Supreme Court precedent mandates a heightened burden for an employer to justify attempts to limit this right.
Consequently, the NLRB ordered Tesla to rescind its policy prohibiting employees from wearing black union shirts.
