The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize 
Heritage, desire and diplomacy: why China still values scotch whisky 
China Exports Surge 25% in August as Trade Surplus Hits $119 Billion 
Google promotes ‘teacher approved’ apps for kids. Here’s what parents should know 
UK Food Inflation Forecast to Hit 6.4% by Mid-2027 
Hormuz Shipping Slows as Iran Threats Lift Oil Risks 
Ingenia Rejects A$1.9 Billion Warburg Pincus Takeover Bid 
Oil Prices Hold Near Highs as U.S.-Iran Conflict Escalates 
OpenAI Targets Specialized Industries as Enterprise AI Demand Grows 
Longsys Raises $903 Million in Hong Kong IPO as Shares Debut Flat 
SEC Seeks ISS Client Voting Records in Proxy Adviser Probe 
U.S. Stock Futures Steady as Oil Tops $100 Ahead of Inflation Data 
Nvidia-Groq AI Chip Deal Faces U.S. Antitrust Probe 
Meta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement, Tightens Teen Social Media Rules 
Every generation thinks they had it the toughest, but for Gen Z, they’re probably right 
US Stock Futures Mixed as Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that it was unlawful for Tesla to prohibit employees from wearing shirts bearing a union insignia.
In a 3-2 decision on a 2017 dispute between Tesla and the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union, the NLRB said that companies interfering with employees' rights to display union insignia have the burden of establishing special circumstances justifying it.
The majority found that the electric car maker failed to establish those special circumstances in this case.
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran said the decision reaffirms the presumptive unlawfulness of any attempt to restrict the wearing of union clothing or insignia.
A Supreme Court precedent mandates a heightened burden for an employer to justify attempts to limit this right.
Consequently, the NLRB ordered Tesla to rescind its policy prohibiting employees from wearing black union shirts.
