Former Ben & Jerry's independent board chair Anuradha Mittal has filed a federal defamation lawsuit against Unilever and its recently spun-off ice cream division, Magnum, alleging that both companies deliberately damaged her reputation after she publicly advocated for Palestinian rights and a Gaza ceasefire. The complaint, filed in Oakland, California, marks the latest flashpoint in a prolonged corporate conflict over Ben & Jerry's independence and social mission.
Mittal claims that following Unilever's announcement of the Magnum spinoff in March 2024, tensions intensified and the companies began spreading false allegations against her. These included accusations of self-dealing, misuse of funds from the Ben & Jerry's Foundation, creating a hostile workplace, and general misconduct — all of which she categorically denies. She argues these smear campaigns were calculated to humiliate and professionally discredit her, ultimately contributing to her removal as board chair in December. Beyond reputational harm, Mittal says the ordeal caused depression and chronic insomnia.
Both Unilever and Magnum have dismissed the claims as entirely unfounded, expressing confidence that the legal process will vindicate them. Mittal is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, arguing the defendants acted with actual malice — knowingly making false statements or showing reckless disregard for the truth.
The dispute traces back to 2021, when Ben & Jerry's announced it would halt ice cream sales in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, straining its four-decade relationship with Unilever. That tension escalated when Ben & Jerry's filed its own lawsuit against Unilever in November 2024, accusing the company of trying to dismantle its independent board and suppress its progressive activism. The Ben & Jerry's Foundation recently joined that case as a co-plaintiff, and the litigation remains ongoing.
Mittal, founder of the Oakland Institute and a prominent advocate for marginalized communities, says this battle goes beyond corporate governance — it is fundamentally about protecting the right to stand for social justice without corporate retaliation.


Judge Dismisses Sam Altman Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, But Sister Can Refile
CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Dispute Escalates as Arbitration Claims Surpass $2 Billion
Golden Dome Missile Defense: Anduril and Palantir Join Forces on Trump's $185B Space Shield
Explosion and Fire Erupt at Valero Oil Refinery in Port Arthur, Texas
Moderna to Pay Up to $2.25B to Settle LNP Patent Dispute Over COVID-19 Vaccine Technology
9 Tips for Avoiding Tax Season Cyber Scams
Sonova Shares Slip as Hearing Aid Giant Lowers Growth Outlook and Plans Sennheiser Exit
Federal Judge Orders Refund of Trump’s Emergency Tariffs, Potentially Returning Up to $182 Billion
Federal Reserve Hires Robert Hur to Fight DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Jerome Powell
Federal Judge Blocks Pentagon's Restrictive Press Access Policy
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Move to End Temporary Protected Status for Somali Immigrants
Reflection AI Eyes $25 Billion Valuation in Massive $2.5 Billion Funding Round
Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations
Jerome Powell May Stay on Fed Board Amid Criminal Investigation, Court Documents Reveal
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
Delivery Hero Sells Taiwan Foodpanda to Grab for $600 Million in Debt-Reduction Push
Palestinian Activist Leqaa Kordia Released from U.S. Immigration Detention After Judge's Order 



