The family of Malcolm X has filed a $100 million lawsuit against several U.S. agencies, including the CIA, FBI, and NYPD, alleging their involvement in the 1965 assassination of the iconic civil rights leader. The lawsuit, filed nearly 60 years after his death, seeks to uncover long-hidden truths about Malcolm X’s killing and hold these institutions accountable for their alleged roles in the conspiracy.
Decades-Old Questions Resurface
The assassination of Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little, has remained a contentious and unresolved chapter in U.S. history. He was gunned down on February 21, 1965, at the Audubon Ballroom in New York City during a speech, a tragedy that marked a significant turning point in the civil rights movement. While three men were convicted of the killing, questions about broader conspiracies and institutional involvement have lingered for decades.
Malcolm X’s family alleges that government agencies and law enforcement conspired to silence him as his influence grew within the civil rights and Black nationalist movements. They argue that the release of recently declassified documents has further implicated these agencies in a coordinated effort to target and ultimately assassinate the activist.
The Lawsuit’s Allegations
The $100 million lawsuit, filed by Malcolm X’s daughters, accuses the CIA, FBI, and NYPD of withholding critical evidence that could have exonerated the wrongfully convicted and exposed the true orchestrators of the assassination. The family claims these agencies failed to intervene despite allegedly knowing about threats to Malcolm X’s life.
Attorney Ben Crump, representing the family, stated that the lawsuit seeks justice for Malcolm X’s descendants and aims to reveal the institutional negligence and misconduct that led to his assassination. “For too long, key players have escaped accountability,” Crump asserted during a press conference.
The legal team plans to build its case using declassified documents, witness accounts, and newly uncovered evidence. Advocates for the family also hope the lawsuit will reignite public scrutiny of the assassination and force government transparency.
Controversy Over Government Involvement
The lawsuit has stirred significant controversy, with critics accusing the family of reopening wounds long healed. However, supporters argue that the case is not about relitigating history but about holding institutions accountable for decades of alleged cover-ups. The filing coincides with ongoing efforts to re-examine civil rights-era killings, many of which involved claims of government complicity.
Historical Context Meets Modern-Day Relevance
This legal action comes at a time when public trust in law enforcement and government institutions is under intense scrutiny. Allegations of systemic racism and abuse of power have led to renewed calls for justice in unsolved civil rights cases. Malcolm X’s assassination is now part of this broader reckoning, as activists push for accountability from entities long accused of targeting Black leaders.
The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent, particularly if the family’s claims lead to further disclosures about government activities during the civil rights movement.


UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict
Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues
Intel Rejects TSMC’s Allegations of Trade-Secret Leaks as Legal Battle Escalates
Union Urges Court to Compel Trump Administration to Restore CFPB Funding
Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro to Begin 27-Year Prison Term
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed
Afghan Suspect in Deadly Shooting of National Guard Members Faces First-Degree Murder Charge
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends
Peru’s Ex-President Martín Vizcarra Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Corruption
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges
States Sue Trump Administration Over SNAP Restrictions for Legal Immigrants
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Medicaid Funding Restrictions Targeting Planned Parenthood
Meta Accused of Halting Internal Research on Mental Health Risks of Facebook and Instagram 



