Exxon Mobil Set to Appoint Alex Volkov as Global Trading Chief 
Oil Prices Fall as Trump Signals Iran Deal, Reducing Supply Risk Concerns 
Trump Signals Possible U.S.-Iran Peace Deal as Hormuz Reopening Nears 
OpenAI May Slash AI Service Prices Amid Growing Rivalry With Anthropic 
Asics Considers Onitsuka Tiger Spinoff as Luxury Sneaker Brand Expands Globally 
US Dollar Edges Higher as Inflation Data and Middle East Tensions Shape Market Sentiment 
Carney and Macron Strengthen Canada-France Defense Ties Amid US Trade Uncertainty 
Kremlin Says New EU Sanctions Won’t Hurt Russian Banks 
ECB Keeps July Rate Options Open Amid Iran War Energy Price Risks 
SK Hynix Stock Rebounds as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Expansion Plans 
GM and Peak Energy Partner to Advance Sodium-Ion Battery Technology for Grid Storage 
Gold Prices Slide Toward Second Weekly Loss as Fed Rate Hike Expectations Weigh on Market 
Coupang Hit With Record $409 Million Fine Over Data Breach Affecting 33 Million Users 
Meta AI Strategy Faces Challenges as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes in Internal Memo 
Meta Partners With Reliance to Launch First AI-Powered Data Center in India 
South Korea Signals Possible Interest Rate Hike as Inflation Remains Elevated 
Oracle Stock Falls Despite Earnings Beat as Company Plans $40 Billion Financing for FY2027 
Amazon was declared the winner in a tax legal battle where the EU ordered it to pay Luxembourg the amount of €250 million or around $303 million in back taxes. The win for the American retail giant is said to be a big blow to European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager's campaign against preferential deals.
Why Amazon was favored in the court
As per Reuters, the hitch, which is Amazon’s win in the tax case, triggered renewed calls from EU lawmakers for a global corporate tax deal. Despite losing, analysts said that Vestager is not likely to give up on her crusade regarding the amount of tax that big companies should pay.
In any case, based on the EU’s court ruling, Amazon won in the legal dispute after the group of legislators was not able to show that Luxembourg gave Jeff Bezos’ company a special treatment that violates state aid rules.
"The Commission did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group," the EU judges stated in the ruling.
This legal dispute stemmed from the order that Amazon received in 2017. The European Commission ordered the American e-commerce and tech firm to pay €250 million to Luxembourg for back taxes.
Second loss for EU tax crusaders
It was mentioned that this is the second defeat for Vestager as it also lost in the court tussle against Apple last year. At that time, the American tech company contested an EU order for it to pay €13 billion or $15 billion in Irish back taxes.
Similar to Amazon’s case, the EU’s court ruled that the commission failed to prove that the Irish government had granted a tax advantage to Apple. The European Commission has since filed an appeal against the ruling in the iPhone maker tax dispute.
Apple and Amazon were said to be targeted by Vestager in the EU's campaign to put an end to tax agreement practices being used by EU states to attract major companies. The group said that such types of deals are not fair.
Meanwhile, Amazon said in a statement that it welcomed the judges’ decision. The company added that it has always been Amazon’s stance to follow all applicable laws and reiterated that it has not received any preferential or special treatment in its dealings.
