Amazon was declared the winner in a tax legal battle where the EU ordered it to pay Luxembourg the amount of €250 million or around $303 million in back taxes. The win for the American retail giant is said to be a big blow to European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager's campaign against preferential deals.
Why Amazon was favored in the court
As per Reuters, the hitch, which is Amazon’s win in the tax case, triggered renewed calls from EU lawmakers for a global corporate tax deal. Despite losing, analysts said that Vestager is not likely to give up on her crusade regarding the amount of tax that big companies should pay.
In any case, based on the EU’s court ruling, Amazon won in the legal dispute after the group of legislators was not able to show that Luxembourg gave Jeff Bezos’ company a special treatment that violates state aid rules.
"The Commission did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group," the EU judges stated in the ruling.
This legal dispute stemmed from the order that Amazon received in 2017. The European Commission ordered the American e-commerce and tech firm to pay €250 million to Luxembourg for back taxes.
Second loss for EU tax crusaders
It was mentioned that this is the second defeat for Vestager as it also lost in the court tussle against Apple last year. At that time, the American tech company contested an EU order for it to pay €13 billion or $15 billion in Irish back taxes.
Similar to Amazon’s case, the EU’s court ruled that the commission failed to prove that the Irish government had granted a tax advantage to Apple. The European Commission has since filed an appeal against the ruling in the iPhone maker tax dispute.
Apple and Amazon were said to be targeted by Vestager in the EU's campaign to put an end to tax agreement practices being used by EU states to attract major companies. The group said that such types of deals are not fair.
Meanwhile, Amazon said in a statement that it welcomed the judges’ decision. The company added that it has always been Amazon’s stance to follow all applicable laws and reiterated that it has not received any preferential or special treatment in its dealings.


ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes
Cisco Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Growth as AI Networking Demand Surges
Yen Stabilizes After Intervention Slide as Australian Dollar Hits Eight-Week High
US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook
South Korean Won Leads Asian FX Losses as Dollar Rises
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors
Oil Prices Rise as Hormuz Reopening Remains Uncertain
Australia Sets New Minimum Pay, Insurance Rules for Gig Workers
Wall Street Slips as Oil Prices Surge 5% on Iran-Hormuz Uncertainty
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast as AI Demand Fuels Economy
Austal Shares Surge 16% as Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for U.S. Shipbuilding Business
Asian Currencies Steady Ahead of US CPI as Oil Prices Rise
Asian Currencies Steady as Markets Await U.S. Inflation Data
Oil Prices Rise as US-Iran Talks Stall, Inflation Risks Grow
Trump Weighs Capital Gains Tax Cuts Ahead of Midterms 



