WILMINGTON, Del., June 09, 2017 -- Andrews & Springer LLC today announced that pursuant to a Stipulation and Order Closing the Case, granted by the Delaware Court of Chancery on June 8, 2017, the parties to the litigation hereby provide the following Notice of Case Dismissal and Mootness Fee Resolution:
Qlik Technologies Inc. Litigation
(Wilmington, Delaware) On June 2, 2016, Qlik Technologies Inc. (“Qlik” or the “Company”) and Thoma Bravo announced that the parties had executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to the terms of which Qlik stockholders received $30.50 per share in cash in exchange for each share of Qlik (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, the Company filed a preliminary proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2016, and subsequently filed a definitive proxy statement on July 6, 2016 (the “Proxy”). A complaint was filed by Plaintiff Brent Charles in the Delaware Court of Chancery against members of the Qlik board of directors, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty for failure to disclose all material information to shareholders in the Proxy. The directors denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing.
However, in order to moot Plaintiff’s disclosure claims, and regardless of their merit or lack thereof, on July 22, 2016, the Company filed “Supplemental Disclosures to Definitive Proxy Statement” on Schedule 14A (the “Supplemental Disclosures”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. That same day, the Plaintiff notified the Court in writing that his claims had been rendered moot and requested the Court to retain jurisdiction solely for the purpose of determining Plaintiff’s counsel’s application for an award of mootness fees and reimbursement of expenses.
After July 22, 2016, the parties engaged in arm’s-length negotiations, and the Company agreed to pay Plaintiff’s counsel $87,500 in mootness fees. On June 8, 2017, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Closing the Case, reiterating final dismissal of the Action with prejudice as to the named Plaintiff only. The Court has not and will not pass any judgment on the fee payment.
Counsel for Plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Esq., Andrews & Springer LLC, 3801 Kennett Pike Bldg. C., Ste. 305, Wilmington, DE 19807 (302) 504-4957. Counsel for Defendants: Jenness E. Parker, Esq., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, 920 North King Street, P.O. Box 636, Wilmington, Delaware 19899 (302) 651-3000.


Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization 



