The pandemic is still disrupting young people’s careers 
AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer 
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip 
South Korea Warns Weak Won Could Push Inflation Higher in 2025 
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest 
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation 
Gold and Silver Prices Dip as Markets Await Key U.S. Economic Data 
MetaX IPO Soars as China’s AI Chip Stocks Ignite Investor Frenzy 
EU Signals Major Shift on 2035 Combustion Engine Ban Amid Auto Industry Pressure 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C. to Continue 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
A U.S. court ruled against Burger King's attempt to quash a lawsuit alleging deceptive advertising, claiming the Whopper appeared larger in ads. This decision may influence similar cases involving major fast-food chains.
U.S. District Judge Roy Altman, presiding over the case in Miami, ruled that Burger King must face legal action regarding allegations that its in-store menu boards falsely portrayed the Whopper. The judge stated that the depiction misleads reasonable customers, potentially constituting a breach of contract.
The proposed class action, representing customers who felt deceived, accuses Burger King of showcasing burgers with overflowing ingredients that give the impression of being 35% larger and containing more than double the amount of meat served.
In response, Burger King, a subsidiary of Restaurant Brands International, argued that it is not obligated to deliver burgers that look "exactly like the picture." Judge Altman insisted that it is up to the jurors to determine what reasonable people would think.
In his official decision on Friday, Judge Altman permitted the customers to proceed with claims based on negligence and unjust enrichment. However, he dismissed claims revolving around TV and online ads, as none promised a specific burger size or weight and failed to deliver on those promises.
Burger King and its legal representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Similarly, the plaintiff's lawyer was not available for comment then. Prior attempts to mediate a settlement between the parties have proven unsuccessful.
This ruling holds implications beyond Burger King. Other fast-food chains, including McDonald's and Wendy's, are battling similar lawsuits in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York. The plaintiff's attorney in the ongoing case referenced Judge Altman's opinion to substantiate continuing the proceedings.
Further, Taco Bell, a subsidiary of Yum Brands, recently faced a legal challenge in the Brooklyn court. The lawsuit alleges that the popular chain sells Crunchwraps and Mexican pizzas with only half the filling advertised.
Each lawsuit seeks a minimum of $5 million in damages, shedding light on the ongoing battle between consumers and fast-food giants over truthful advertising practices.
Photo: Burger King Newsroom
