Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast 
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 
Oil Prices Slide as OPEC, IEA Cut 2026 Demand Forecasts 
Aviva First-Half Operating Profit Jumps 24% as Direct Line Deal Boosts Growth 
S&P 500 Hits Record High as Soft Inflation Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears 
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon 
Bank of America to Buy Up to 49.9% Stake in Jio Credit for $1.92 Billion 
Gold Prices Slip From Two-Month High as Inflation and Fed Outlook Drive Markets 
Heritage, desire and diplomacy: why China still values scotch whisky 
6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash 
US Supreme Court Lets $655.5 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Stand During Appeal 
US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges 
Apple Develops China-Specific AI Model With Alibaba as Apple Intelligence Launch Nears 
Samsung, SK Hynix Shares Surge on Report of Potential Temasek Investment 
Gold Price Holds Near $4,400 as Hormuz Risks and CPI Drive Markets 
DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote 
Canada, US Hold Fresh Trade Talks as August 19 Tariff Deadline Nears 
Add as a preferred source on Google
A U.S. court ruled against Burger King's attempt to quash a lawsuit alleging deceptive advertising, claiming the Whopper appeared larger in ads. This decision may influence similar cases involving major fast-food chains.
U.S. District Judge Roy Altman, presiding over the case in Miami, ruled that Burger King must face legal action regarding allegations that its in-store menu boards falsely portrayed the Whopper. The judge stated that the depiction misleads reasonable customers, potentially constituting a breach of contract.
The proposed class action, representing customers who felt deceived, accuses Burger King of showcasing burgers with overflowing ingredients that give the impression of being 35% larger and containing more than double the amount of meat served.
In response, Burger King, a subsidiary of Restaurant Brands International, argued that it is not obligated to deliver burgers that look "exactly like the picture." Judge Altman insisted that it is up to the jurors to determine what reasonable people would think.
In his official decision on Friday, Judge Altman permitted the customers to proceed with claims based on negligence and unjust enrichment. However, he dismissed claims revolving around TV and online ads, as none promised a specific burger size or weight and failed to deliver on those promises.
Burger King and its legal representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Similarly, the plaintiff's lawyer was not available for comment then. Prior attempts to mediate a settlement between the parties have proven unsuccessful.
This ruling holds implications beyond Burger King. Other fast-food chains, including McDonald's and Wendy's, are battling similar lawsuits in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York. The plaintiff's attorney in the ongoing case referenced Judge Altman's opinion to substantiate continuing the proceedings.
Further, Taco Bell, a subsidiary of Yum Brands, recently faced a legal challenge in the Brooklyn court. The lawsuit alleges that the popular chain sells Crunchwraps and Mexican pizzas with only half the filling advertised.
Each lawsuit seeks a minimum of $5 million in damages, shedding light on the ongoing battle between consumers and fast-food giants over truthful advertising practices.
Photo: Burger King Newsroom
