US Accelerates Taiwan Arms Deliveries Amid Rising China Threat 
Trump Administration Opens Two New Investigations Into Harvard Over Discrimination and Antisemitism 
DOJ Antitrust Chief Rejects Political Fast-Track for Paramount-Skydance Deal 
Taiwan Arms Deal on Track Despite U.S.-China Summit Uncertainty 
ICE Arrest of Guatemalan Woman at San Francisco Airport Sparks Outrage 
Trump Administration Settles Lawsuit Barring Federal Agencies from Pressuring Social Media Censorship 
Cyberattack on Stryker Triggers U.S. Government Warning Over Microsoft Intune Security 
Federal Judge Orders Refund of Trump’s Emergency Tariffs, Potentially Returning Up to $182 Billion 
Trump Says Iran Offered Major Energy Concession Amid Ongoing Negotiations 
Iran Demands Lebanon Be Part of Any Ceasefire Deal With Israel and the U.S. 
Belarus Frees 250 Political Prisoners in Landmark U.S. Sanctions Deal 
Trump White House Unveils National AI Policy Framework for Congress 
FEMA Reinstates $1 Billion Disaster Prevention Grant Program After Court Order 
Trump Seeks Quick End to U.S.-Iran Conflict Amid Ongoing Middle East Tensions 
SEC Eyes Shift to Semiannual Corporate Reporting, Ending 50-Year Quarterly Mandate 
Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations 
U.S. Deploys Elite 82nd Airborne Troops to Middle East Amid Iran Tensions 
A coalition of 20 U.S. states, mostly led by Democrats, has filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s abrupt termination of a major FEMA grant program aimed at protecting communities from natural disasters. Filed in a Boston federal court, the lawsuit argues that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) lacked legal authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program without congressional approval.
The BRIC program, established in 2018, provides federal funding to states for disaster resilience infrastructure projects such as flood defenses, evacuation shelters, and bridge reinforcements. It covers up to 75% of project costs—or 90% for rural areas—and has allocated $4.5 billion to nearly 2,000 projects in the last four years.
Led by Washington and Massachusetts, the states contend that FEMA’s cancellation of BRIC in April violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers. They argue that Congress had already approved and funded the program, making the administration’s unilateral decision unlawful. The lawsuit also claims that the officials who oversaw the termination—Cameron Hamilton and David Richardson—lacked proper appointment authority.
FEMA justified the program’s cancellation by calling it “wasteful, ineffective, and politicized.” However, bipartisan lawmakers urged FEMA in May to restore the grants, emphasizing their importance for vulnerable rural and tribal communities.
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell stressed that the catastrophic Texas floods, which killed over 130 people, underscore the urgent need for federal disaster preparedness funding. The lawsuit seeks a preliminary injunction to reinstate the BRIC program while legal proceedings continue.
This legal action follows another lawsuit in May challenging FEMA’s move to link emergency preparedness funding to immigration enforcement cooperation, signaling broader resistance to the Trump administration’s disaster funding policies.
