UN Security Council Faces Iran Sanctions Vote 
US, Australia Pledge $580 Million for Pacific Islands 
Ukraine Sanctions Chief Heads to Washington to Push Russia Bill 
US-Iran Exchange Strikes as Hormuz Tensions Escalate 
Greenland Says US Talks Remain Ongoing 
Bessent Urges Japan on Fiscal Discipline, BOJ Rate Hikes 
US Strikes Iran as Tehran Retaliates, Oil Prices Surge 
Texas Republicans Turn Against AI Data Centers as Election Backlash Grows 
Australia, US Move to Expand Defence Ties in Indo-Pacific 
US-Iran Conflict Escalates With New Strikes Near Hormuz 
Nicaragua Congress Backs Reform Banning Opposition Parties 
Maduro Seeks Dismissal of US Drug Trafficking Charges 
South Korea Unveils Record $597 Billion 2027 Budget to Boost AI and Chips 
Two Palestinian Teenagers Killed in West Bank Violence 
Augusto Cury Surges in Brazil Presidential Polls 
US Approves $800 Million Helicopter Sale to Iraq 
Lula Runs Cautious Brazil Election Campaign as Bolsonaro Narrows Poll Gap 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Former President Donald Trump made a controversial move when he stood in front of a church to take a photo amidst the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests that he denounced. Federal attorneys are now looking to have the lawsuits against the former president for clearing Lafayette Square.
Last week, federal lawyers were seeking to have the lawsuits against Trump and other former officials dismissed for the manner in which Lafayette Square was cleared. The lawyers cited that the new administration would not engage in similar behavior as a reason to dismiss the cases. The controversial photo op came as there were widespread protests after the death of George Floyd.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit on behalf of the individuals that were affected by the clearing of Lafayette Square for Trump at the time. US District Court Judge Dabney L. Freidrich heard arguments on whether or not to dismiss the cases.
An attorney for the protesters, however, argued that the demonstrators did nothing illegal and did not pose a threat. Some of the demonstrators suffered injuries as a result of the incident, and the attorneys argued that it is important to find out how the official response happened. Attorney Randy Mastro also cited that the then-Attorney General said that there was no violence that occurred on that day during the protests.
Lawyers for the previous administration claimed that they had immunity as they were only doing what was necessary to clear the space for the now-former president to walk through.
The manner in which space was cleared for Trump to pass through and have a photo taken in front of a church was especially noted in the lawsuits. The lawyer for the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department confirmed that tear gas was used on the demonstrators in order to clear the grounds for Trump and his senior aides to pass through.
Attorney Richard Sobiecki confirmed during a court hearing last week that authorities used tear gas on protesters. Sobiecki added that the officers were not targeting anyone in particular and that they did not violate any constitutional rights.
“The curfew, violence of past nights, chaos created by federal defendants, discharge of tear gas in that direction was not unreasonable,” said Sobiecki.
