U.S. President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration is withdrawing National Guard troops from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, while warning that federal forces could return if crime rates rise again. The decision follows months of legal challenges and criticism from local leaders who argued the deployments were unnecessary and unlawful.
In a social media post, Trump claimed crime had been “greatly reduced” due to the presence of the National Guard and described the troops as “great Patriots.” He added that federal forces would “come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form,” should crime increase in the future. The announcement came as courts continued to question the legality of the deployments.
Local officials and Democratic leaders in the affected cities have consistently accused the Trump administration of federal overreach, saying it exaggerated isolated incidents of violence to justify sending troops. Judges overseeing lawsuits filed by cities ruled that the federal government overstepped its authority and failed to prove that National Guard deployments were necessary to protect federal property or personnel from protesters.
The legal pressure intensified when a federal appellate court ruled that hundreds of California National Guard troops must be returned to Governor Gavin Newsom’s control. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, stating that presidential authority to federalize the Guard likely applies only in “exceptional” circumstances. The court noted that the administration failed to identify a lawful basis for using the military to execute laws in the state.
Newsom’s office responded sharply to Trump’s announcement, calling it a political retreat driven by court rulings. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s office also pushed back, sharing 2025 data showing violent crime in the city fell to its lowest level in more than a decade, down 21.3% from 2024.
Trump initially began deploying troops in June amid protests over his strict immigration policies and increased deportation efforts. He also sent forces to Washington, D.C., asserting that crime was rampant, despite local statistics suggesting otherwise. Military officials have since been scaling back the deployments as ongoing litigation left their status uncertain, marking another chapter in the debate over federal authority, public safety, and the role of the National Guard in U.S. cities.


U.S. Intelligence Disputes Russia’s Claim of Ukrainian Drone Attack on Putin
Federal Judge Upholds Trump Administration’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Pentagon Awards $328.5 Million Lockheed Martin Contract to Support Taiwan Air Force Amid Rising Tensions
U.S. Shifts Strategy Toward Economic Pressure With Venezuelan Oil Quarantine
Trump Administration Clarifies Minnesota Childcare Funding Status Amid Fraud Claims
China to Tighten Crude Steel Output Controls and Export Regulation Through 2030
Zelenskiy Says Ukraine Seeks Strong Peace Deal, Rejects “Weak” Agreement in New Year Address
USDA $12 Billion Farm Aid Program Draws Mixed Reactions from Row Crop Farmers
Australia Orders Independent Review After Bondi Mass Shooting, Albanese Resists Royal Commission Calls
NSW Passes Toughest Gun and Anti-Terror Laws After Bondi Beach Shooting
Russia Accuses Ukraine of Drone Plot Against Putin as Peace Talks Face New Strain
Trump Administration Lifts Sanctions on Three Intellexa-Linked Executives
China Proposes Stricter Rules for AI Services Offering Emotional Interaction
U.S. Government Agrees to Review Frozen NIH Diversity Research Grants After Legal Challenge
Trump Administration Audits Somali-Origin Citizenship Cases Amid Fraud Allegations
Trump Administration Recalls Nearly 30 U.S. Ambassadors in Push for “America First” Agenda
U.S. Questions Russia’s Claim of Ukrainian Drone Attack on Putin Residence 



