Since departing from the White House in January, former President Donald Trump has been living at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida full-time. However, as many locals have brought up the agreement he made in 1993, the Palm Beach Council will not conduct a review as to whether Trump will now be allowed to reside there.
The town council of Palm Beach is undergoing a deliberation to decide whether Trump can stay at his Mar-a-Lago resort full time. This is despite Trump facing an impeachment trial before the Senate this week. The council will hear from the attorney’s opinion on whether it can stop Trump from residing in his club due to the 1993 agreement Trump made with the town. The agreement was that Trump cannot reside in the town should he convert Mar-a-Lago from a residence to a resort.
The agreement was brought up when a neighbor in the area through an attorney sent a letter to the council demanding that the former president stop living at the resort. The neighbor cited that the former president actively residing at Mar-a-Lago would lower property values in the area.
It should be noted that Trump is technically an employee of the corporation that owns Mar-a-Lago and the written agreement only states that members are not allowed to live there. Via the town’s regulations, the club can provide onsite housing to employees. Trump returns to being an employee after leaving office last January 20. Trump and former first lady Melania Trump have since changed their voting address to Mar-a-Lago back in 2019 and have been voting in the state.
Aside from the possibility that Trump may not be allowed to reside in Mar-a-Lago full time, Trump was recently issued a permanent ban from SAG-AFTRA. The organization’s National Board announced that they passed a resolution permanently barring Trump from re-applying for membership in the union. This was in light of Trump’s involvement during the January 6 riots at the Capitol that led to the union to discuss disciplinary action. This also led to Trump issuing a resignation letter upon receiving a threat of getting kicked out.
“Preventing Donald Trump from ever rejoining SAG-AFTRA is more than a symbolic step. It is a resounding statement that threatening or inciting harm against fellow members will not be tolerated. An attack against one is an attack against all,” said SAG-AFTRA president Gabrielle Carteris in a statement.


Cuba Reaffirms Anti-Drug Cooperation as Tensions Rise in the Caribbean
Maduro Confirms “Respectful” Call With Trump, Signals Openness to Diplomatic Dialogue
Taiwan Signals Openness to Renew Ties with Honduras as Election Unfolds
Hong Kong Faces Low Turnout in “Patriots-Only” Election Amid Public Grief After Deadly Fire
U.S.-Russia Talks Leave Ukraine Peace Efforts Uncertain
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative
Australia and Japan Strengthen Defence Cooperation Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Trump Administration Tightens H-1B Visa Vetting With New Focus on Free Speech and Censorship
China Urged to Prioritize Economy Over Territorial Ambitions, Says Taiwan’s President Lai
China’s Expanding Maritime Military Presence Alarms Taiwan and Japan
California Launches Portal for Reporting Alleged Misconduct by Federal Immigration Agents
U.S. Repatriation Flight Carrying 266 Venezuelan Migrants Lands in Caracas
Pentagon Probe Finds Hegseth’s Use of Signal Risked Exposing Sensitive Yemen Strike Details
U.S. Defense Chief Pete Hegseth Defends Controversial Second Strike on Suspected Drug-Smuggling Vessel
U.S. Justice Department Orders Intensified Probe Into Antifa and Domestic Extremist Groups 



