TSMC Shares Hit Record High as AI Chip Demand Fuels Strong Q4 Earnings 
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery 
Walmart International CEO Kathryn McLay to Step Down After Two and a Half Years 
Rio Tinto and BHP Agree to Explore Major Iron Ore Collaboration in Pilbara 
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production 
TSMC Set to Post Record Q4 Profit as AI Chip Demand Accelerates 
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft 
Boeing Reaches Tentative Labor Deal With SPEEA Workers After Spirit AeroSystems Acquisition 
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement 
U.S. Transportation Board Sends Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger Back for Revision 
Microsoft Strikes Landmark Soil Carbon Credit Deal With Indigo Carbon to Boost Carbon-Negative Goal 
Boeing Reaches Tentative Settlement With Canadian Victim’s Family in 737 MAX Crash Lawsuits 
Sanofi Gains China Approval for Myqorzo and Redemplo, Strengthening Rare Disease Portfolio 
TikTok Expands AI Age-Detection Technology Across Europe Amid Rising Regulatory Pressure 
One Percent Rule Checklist For Safer Forex Trading Risk 
China’s AI Models Narrow the Gap With the West, Says Google DeepMind CEO 
China Considers New Rules to Limit Purchases of Foreign AI Chips Amid Growing Demand 
In new research just published in a special issue of the Journal of Portfolio Management on factor investing, ERI Scientific Beta has validated the superiority of the top-down approach to multi-factor investing over a bottom-up approach.
The ERI Scientific Beta paper, entitled "Accounting for Cross-Factor Interactions in Multifactor Portfolios without Sacrificing Diversification and Risk Control," compares different approaches for constructing multi-factor equity portfolios: "bottom-up" score-weighting approaches that target high factor intensity and "top-down" approaches that also consider diversification objectives.
The risks and shortcomings of the bottom-up approach are shown to be inefficiency, instability and the inability to control factor exposure and non-factor risks:
- Focusing solely on increasing factor intensity leads to inefficiency in capturing factor premia, as exposure to unrewarded risks more than offsets the benefits of increased factor scores.
- High factor scores in "bottom-up" approaches also come with high instability in factor exposure and high turnover.
- Concentrating portfolios in multi-factor champions can also lead to significant geographical or sector biases.
The authors introduce a new approach that considers cross-factor interactions in "top-down" portfolios through an adjustment at the stock selection level. This approach leads to higher levels of diversification and produces higher returns per unit of factor intensity. The authors report that it dominates "bottom-up" approaches in terms of relative performance, while considerably reducing extreme relative losses and turnover. In addition, this approach preserves the well-known benefits of the top-down approach in terms of explicit and transparent control of exposures to risk factors.
A copy of the article is accessible by clicking on the link below:
As part of its policy of transferring know-how to the industry, EDHEC-Risk Institute has set up ERI Scientific Beta. ERI Scientific Beta is an original initiative which aims to favour the adoption of the latest advances in smart beta design and implementation by the whole investment industry. Its academic origin provides the foundation for its strategy: offer, in the best economic conditions possible, the smart beta solutions that are most proven scientifically with full transparency of both the methods and the associated risks.
ERI Scientific Beta, 1 George Street, #07-02, Singapore 049145. For further information, please contact: [email protected], Web: www.scientificbeta.com.
Attachments:
http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/863b3bf9-fa6b-4d14-b5a7-dcb17cfd0940
