Dollar Slides to Five-Week Low as Asian Stocks Struggle and Markets Bet on Fed Rate Cut 
Oil Prices Slip as Russia-Ukraine Peace Hopes Fade and Oversupply Fears Grow 
Dollar Holds Steady as Markets Shift Focus to 2026 Rate Cut Expectations 
South Korea Inflation Edges Up in November as Food and Service Costs Climb 
Trump Claims He Will Void Biden Documents Signed with Autopen 
South Korea Posts Stronger-Than-Expected 1.3% Economic Growth in Q3 
BOJ’s Kazuo Ueda Signals Potential Interest Rate Hike as Economic Outlook Improves 
BOJ’s Noguchi Calls for Cautious, Gradual Interest Rate Hikes to Sustain Inflation Goals 
Singapore Maintains Steady Monetary Outlook as Positive Output Gap Persists into 2025 
Senators Warn Trump Against Unauthorized Venezuela Strike, Vow War Powers Push 
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears 
Trump Administration Tightens H-1B Visa Vetting With New Focus on Free Speech and Censorship 
Oil Prices Rise as Ukraine Targets Russian Energy Infrastructure 
Fed Officials Split as Powell Weighs December Interest Rate Cut 
U.S. Repatriation Flight Carrying 266 Venezuelan Migrants Lands in Caracas 
Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran has sparked debate with claims that President Donald Trump’s stricter immigration policies will significantly reduce rent inflation and overall consumer prices. However, economists caution that Miran may be overstating the impact.
Miran’s argument draws from research by MIT economist Albert Saiz, who has long studied immigration and housing markets. Saiz’s findings show that a 1% rise in a city’s population from immigration leads to about a 1% increase in rents. By extension, reversing immigration inflows could ease rental costs slightly. But Saiz notes the effect on national inflation is minimal—at most 0.1 percentage points—given the overall U.S. population base. “Population growth impacts housing prices, but not enough to justify major policy shifts,” Saiz explained.
In his debut speech, Miran instead based calculations on the U.S. renter population of 100 million, not the total 340 million, inflating the projected impact nearly threefold. He suggested rent inflation could fall two percentage points by 2027, reducing the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, the personal consumption expenditures index, by 0.4 percentage points. Miran argued this would justify cutting interest rates by half a point, contending the Fed’s current stance is “fully 2 percentage points too high.”
Miran cited Saiz’s 2003 study on the Mariel boatlift, which examined Cuban immigration’s impact on Miami’s rental market. Yet later research, including Saiz’s 2007 paper and other international studies, points to more modest or even opposite effects, such as deportations reducing construction supply and pushing housing costs higher.
The Fed quietly updated Miran’s speech to clarify that his estimate stemmed from a unique “quasi-random immigration shock.” Still, his stance underscores growing political pressure on the Fed as Trump pushes for rate cuts and seeks to reshape its leadership. With Miran’s term ending January 31, his window to influence monetary policy is narrow, but his arguments highlight the contentious intersection of immigration, housing, and central banking.
