United States Officially Exits World Health Organization, Raising Global Public Health Concerns 
Trump Pushes Back on 401(k) Homebuyer Plan Amid Housing Affordability Debate 
ICE Blocked From Entering Ecuador Consulate in Minneapolis During Immigration Operation 
Bolsonaro to Be Moved to Papuda Prison After Supreme Court Order 
U.S. Vaccine Policy Shifts Under RFK Jr. Create Uncertainty for Pharma and Investors 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
U.S.–Venezuela Relations Show Signs of Thaw as Top Envoy Visits Caracas 
Why Trump’s new pick for Fed chair hit gold and silver markets – for good reasons 
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case 
Trump Proposes Two-Year Shutdown of Kennedy Center Amid Ongoing Turmoil 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
Pentagon and Anthropic Clash Over AI Safeguards in National Security Use 
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell 
South Korea Repatriates 73 Suspected Online Scammers From Cambodia in Major Crackdown 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
