U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday 
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Paul Atkins Emphasizes Global Regulatory Cooperation at Fintech Conference 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University 
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales 
RFK Jr. Overhauls Federal Autism Panel, Sparking Medical Community Backlash 
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links 
Faith Leaders Arrested on Capitol Hill During Protest Against Trump Immigration Policies and ICE Funding 
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 
China Approves First Import Batch of Nvidia H200 AI Chips Amid Strategic Shift 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
