Nike Tariff Refund Lawsuit Sparks Consumer Backlash Over Price Increases 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Ghana Rejects U.S. Health Deal Over Data Sharing Concerns Amid Foreign Aid Shift 
Apple Wins ITC Ruling, Keeping Blood-Oxygen Feature on Apple Watch 
New York Moves to Ban Masked Law Enforcement During Immigration Operations 
China Banks Halt New Loans to Sanctioned Refineries Amid U.S.-Iran Oil Crackdown 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
US Adds European Union to Section 301 Watchlist Amid Trade Concerns 
Trump Administration Releases New UFO Files and Apollo Mission Records 
Qatar LNG Tanker Crosses Strait of Hormuz Amid Iran War Tensions 
Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed 
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case 
Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit 
FEMA Reinstates Employees After Dissent Letter, Signaling Shift in Workforce Stability 
Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Attempting to Block Hawaii's Climate Case Against Oil Giants 
Sam Altman Moves to Dismiss Punitive Damages in Sister's Sexual Abuse Lawsuit 
Medicare to Cover GLP-1 Weight-Loss and Diabetes Drugs Starting July 1 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
