US Seizes Nearly 400 Illegal World Cup Streaming Domains in Global Anti-Piracy Crackdown 
China Expands Export Controls, Adds 20 Japanese Companies to Restricted List 
France Battles Mediterranean Wildfires as Heatwave Fuels Fire Risk 
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing 
US Waives Iran Sanctions for 60 Days as Peace Talks Advance and Lebanon Sees Calm 
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court 
Israeli Airstrike Kills Two in Gaza City as Ceasefire Violations and Truce Talks Persist 
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures 
Colombia Opens New Investigation Into Former President Álvaro Uribe Over Paramilitary Allegations 
Burgum Defends Free Speech as Patriot Front July 4 March Sparks Debate 
Trump Signs Memorandum Backing Americans’ Right to Repair Their Own Vehicles 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Gautam Adani Bribery Case, Citing Foreign Scope 
Iran Holds State Funeral for Ali Khamenei as Security Fears Shape Succession 
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks 
Trump Administration to Launch Voluntary AI Standards for Frontier Models 
Two federal judges have ruled that President Donald Trump’s administration cannot suspend food assistance for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown. The rulings, issued in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, require the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to use available contingency funds to continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps.
The decisions come after lawsuits filed by Democratic-led states, cities, and advocacy groups challenged the administration’s plan to halt SNAP payments starting November 1. U.S. District Judges John McConnell and Indira Talwani, both appointed by former President Barack Obama, determined that the USDA’s refusal to use its $5.25 billion contingency fund was unjustified and would cause “irreparable harm” to millions of low-income Americans.
Judge McConnell emphasized that withholding aid was “arbitrary,” urging the USDA to release emergency funds immediately. He also suggested that if the contingency fund proves insufficient, the agency could explore using other federal reserves estimated at $23 billion. Judge Talwani agreed, stating that the administration misinterpreted the law by claiming it lacked authority to use the contingency funds during the shutdown.
The USDA, however, has maintained that it does not have adequate funding to provide full benefits to the 42 million Americans relying on SNAP, which costs up to $9 billion monthly. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins argued that Democrats’ claims about available funding were misleading, saying the contingency funds require congressional approval before they can be used.
Despite the administration’s legal concerns, both judges ordered the government to find a way to continue distributing benefits. The White House must report its compliance plan by Monday. SNAP provides essential food assistance to Americans earning less than 130% of the federal poverty line, making this ruling crucial for millions struggling with food insecurity.
