Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action 
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns 
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters 
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue 
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University 
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Could Expand as Ukraine Peace Talks Continue, Says Treasury Secretary Bessent 
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business 
NATO to Discuss Strengthening Greenland Security Amid Arctic Tensions 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Federal judges in Maryland, New Hampshire, and Washington, D.C., have blocked the Trump administration from cutting off funding to schools supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The rulings came in response to lawsuits filed by teachers' unions and civil rights groups, challenging a policy from the U.S. Department of Education that threatened funding cuts for K-12 schools and universities promoting DEI programs.
The contested policy was introduced in a February 14 "Dear Colleague" letter, accusing schools of using "race-based preferences" and "indoctrinating" students with teachings on systemic racism. The department warned institutions to align with federal civil rights laws or face funding losses.
U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty of New Hampshire sided with the National Education Association, ruling the policy violated First Amendment rights and was unconstitutionally vague. She noted the department failed to define what constitutes a "DEI program," making enforcement arbitrary and threatening academic freedom.
In Maryland, Judge Stephanie Gallagher, appointed by Trump, agreed with the American Federation of Teachers and other plaintiffs, stating the policy bypassed proper rulemaking and exceeded the Education Department’s authority under the 1979 Department of Education Organization Act, which prohibits federal interference in school curriculum and instructional choices.
Judge Dabney Friedrich in Washington, D.C., also appointed by Trump, sided with the NAACP and ruled the policy too vague, blocking a related April 3 mandate that required state agencies to certify compliance or risk losing federal funding.
Legal advocacy group Democracy Forward, which represented plaintiffs in the Maryland case, hailed the decisions as a win against censorship in education. The Education Department has yet to respond but is expected to appeal.
These rulings highlight growing legal pushback against efforts to limit DEI programs in U.S. schools.
