NEW YORK, Jan. 25, 2017 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against BT Group plc (“BT Group” or the “Company”) (NYSE:BT) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of persons or entities of who purchased or otherwise acquired BT Group American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) between May 23, 2013 and January 23, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
According to the Complaint, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company’s Italian division had for years engaged in improper accounting practices; (ii) as a result, BT Group significantly overstated its earnings throughout the Class Period; (iii) the foregoing facts, when they became known, would foreseeably cause BT Group to cut its revenue, earnings, and free cash flow forecasts; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, BT Group’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On October 27, 2016, BT Group announced that the Company had uncovered “inappropriate management behavior” at its Italian division. BT Group advised investors that the Company had “conducted an initial internal investigation” which “included a review of accounting practices during which we have identified certain historical accounting errors and reassessed certain areas of management judgment.” Consequently, the Company announced that it had “written down the value of items on the balance sheet by £145 million.” On this news, BT Group’s ADR price fell $0.57, or 2.39%, to close at $23.25 on October 27, 2016.
On January 24, 2017, BT Group issued a news release entitled “Update on investigation into BT’s Italian business and on BT Group outlook.” On this news, BT Group’s ADR price fell $5.05, or 20.67%, to close at $19.38 on January 24, 2017.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 27, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.


FTC Praises Instacart for Ending AI Pricing Tests After $60M Settlement
Uber and Baidu Partner to Test Robotaxis in the UK, Marking a New Milestone for Autonomous Ride-Hailing
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement
Warner Bros Discovery Weighs Amended Paramount Skydance Bid as Netflix Takeover Battle Intensifies
Niigata Set to Approve Restart of Japan’s Largest Nuclear Power Plant in Major Energy Shift
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties
Italy Fines Apple €98.6 Million Over App Store Dominance
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown
FDA Fast-Tracks Approval of Altria’s on! PLUS Nicotine Pouches Under New Pilot Program
California Regulator Probes Waymo Robotaxi Stalls During San Francisco Power Outage
Maersk Vessel Successfully Transits Red Sea After Nearly Two Years Amid Ongoing Security Concerns
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training
Moore Threads Unveils New GPUs, Fuels Optimism Around China’s AI Chip Ambitions
Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling
Mexico Antitrust Review of Viva Aerobus–Volaris Deal Signals Growth for Airline Sector
JPMorgan’s Top Large-Cap Pharma Stocks to Watch in 2026
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 



