New reports indicate that Samsung's Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus might feature the in-house Exynos 2500 chipsets, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra is set to run exclusively on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 processor.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Power Galaxy S25 Ultra
According to X user Sawyer Galox's summary of Samsung's Galaxy S25 plans, the company will only release the "Ultra" model with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4.
The Korean behemoth continued this practice with the Galaxy S24 launch as well; whilst the Ultra model was the only one to come with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, the S24 and Plus models had either the Exynos 2400 or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 included, based on the buyer's location.
Exynos 2500 Faces Production Challenges
Commenters on the forum have disputed Sawyer Galox's assertions, arguing that the low yields of Samsung's 3nm GAA process do not bode well for the Exynos 2500's mass production.
The fact that Samsung's 3nm GAA technology reportedly had yields three times lower than the minimum threshold needed to begin mass production was cited by WCCFTECH as the reason the company was unable to attract new customers.
Qualcomm’s Influence Over Samsung’s Lineup
The rumor mill also claimed that the base Galaxy S25 will get the Dimensity 9400, but Qualcomm may have coerced Samsung into releasing the new lineup with only the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 processors.
The San Diego chipset company is expected to earn roughly $1.62 billion in Q4 2024 from sales of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4, according to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. This is a 50% increase in shipments compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in this quarter.
Samsung Remains Silent on Exynos 2500 Announcement
Qualcomm does not want competitors like MediaTek to get in the way of its relationship with Samsung, which is its biggest customer. With October coming to a close and no formal statement on the Exynos 2500 chipset yet made, it is surprising that Sawyer Galox is still insistent that Samsung would employ it in the Galaxy S25 and Galaxy S25 Plus.
Keep in mind that last year's Exynos 2400 was revealed on October 5th; clearly, Samsung is facing issues that it can't control. We will keep our readers informed in the coming weeks of any modifications to the company's intentions.


Proxy Advisors Urge Vote Against ANZ’s Executive Pay Report Amid Scandal Fallout
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban
Norway’s Wealth Fund Backs Shareholder Push for Microsoft Human-Rights Risk Report
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature
Lockheed Martin Secures $1.14 Billion Contract Boost for F-35 Production
Baidu Cuts Jobs as AI Competition and Ad Revenue Slump Intensify
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation
Nexperia Urges China Division to Resume Chip Production as Supply Risks Mount
Intel Boosts Malaysia Operations with Additional RM860 Million Investment
Tesla Expands Affordable Model 3 Lineup in Europe to Boost EV Demand
Quantum Systems Projects Revenue Surge as It Eyes IPO or Private Sale
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 



