DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s Fraud Claims Against OpenAI, Trial to Proceed on Remaining Allegations 
Florida Launches Criminal Probe Into OpenAI Over FSU Shooting Incident 
Russian Border Drone Attack Leaves One Dead in Belgorod Region 
Macron Faces Political Test Over Bank of France Nomination Ahead of 2027 Election 
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case 
US-China Trade Talks Sideline Chip Export Controls as Nvidia China Sales Draw Attention 
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over Trump Administration’s Flavored E-Cigarette Policy 
Pentagon Halts Planned U.S. Troop Deployment to Poland Amid Europe Force Review 
Trump Faces Uphill Battle Seeking China’s Help on Iran Conflict 
Comey Faces Charges Over Instagram Post as Free Speech Debate Intensifies 
Nike Tariff Refund Lawsuit Sparks Consumer Backlash Over Price Increases 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed 
Nvidia’s China AI Chip Sales Remain Frozen Despite U.S. Approval 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
Harvard University professors have filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration’s review of nearly $9 billion in federal funding, alleging violations of academic freedom and free speech. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Boston federal court by the Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and its national counterpart, challenges the legality of the administration’s review, which it says is politically motivated.
The administration began reviewing $255.6 million in contracts and $8.7 billion in long-term grant commitments to Harvard and its affiliates. Officials from the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and General Services Administration demanded that Harvard meet several conditions to retain funding, including banning masks during protests, eliminating DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) programs, and ensuring cooperation with law enforcement.
The administration cited Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by federally funded institutions, as its legal basis for the crackdown. However, the plaintiffs argue that these actions are politically driven and infringe upon constitutional rights. According to the lawsuit, the administration is attempting to force Harvard to adopt its political agenda by threatening to withhold funding based on pro-Palestinian campus protests and university policies on inclusion and gender identity.
Harvard law professor Andrew Crespo, counsel to the school’s AAUP chapter, said the move violates First Amendment protections. “Government officials cannot use their power to suppress speech they disagree with,” he stated.
Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor Harvard commented on the lawsuit.
The case highlights growing tensions between elite universities and the Trump administration over issues such as academic expression, antisemitism, and protest rights. If successful, the lawsuit could set a precedent in the battle over federal influence on higher education policies.
