Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Medicaid Funding Restrictions Targeting Planned Parenthood 
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges 
U.S. Justice Department Orders Intensified Probe Into Antifa and Domestic Extremist Groups 
Tunisian Opposition Figure Chaima Issa Arrested Amid Rising Crackdown 
Trump Administration Tightens H-1B Visa Vetting With New Focus on Free Speech and Censorship 
China Urged to Prioritize Economy Over Territorial Ambitions, Says Taiwan’s President Lai 
Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Jair Bolsonaro to Begin 27-Year Prison Term 
Maduro Confirms “Respectful” Call With Trump, Signals Openness to Diplomatic Dialogue 
Australia and Japan Strengthen Defence Cooperation Amid Rising Regional Tensions 
Honduras Election Turmoil Deepens as Nasralla Alleges Fraud in Tight Presidential Race 
Hong Kong Faces Low Turnout in “Patriots-Only” Election Amid Public Grief After Deadly Fire 
U.S.-Russia Talks Leave Ukraine Peace Efforts Uncertain 
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
States Sue Trump Administration Over SNAP Restrictions for Legal Immigrants 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Honduras Election Turmoil Intensifies as Nasralla Blames Trump for Shift in Results 
Netanyahu Requests Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Harvard University professors have filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration’s review of nearly $9 billion in federal funding, alleging violations of academic freedom and free speech. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Boston federal court by the Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and its national counterpart, challenges the legality of the administration’s review, which it says is politically motivated.
The administration began reviewing $255.6 million in contracts and $8.7 billion in long-term grant commitments to Harvard and its affiliates. Officials from the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and General Services Administration demanded that Harvard meet several conditions to retain funding, including banning masks during protests, eliminating DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) programs, and ensuring cooperation with law enforcement.
The administration cited Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by federally funded institutions, as its legal basis for the crackdown. However, the plaintiffs argue that these actions are politically driven and infringe upon constitutional rights. According to the lawsuit, the administration is attempting to force Harvard to adopt its political agenda by threatening to withhold funding based on pro-Palestinian campus protests and university policies on inclusion and gender identity.
Harvard law professor Andrew Crespo, counsel to the school’s AAUP chapter, said the move violates First Amendment protections. “Government officials cannot use their power to suppress speech they disagree with,” he stated.
Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor Harvard commented on the lawsuit.
The case highlights growing tensions between elite universities and the Trump administration over issues such as academic expression, antisemitism, and protest rights. If successful, the lawsuit could set a precedent in the battle over federal influence on higher education policies.
