SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
GAINESVILLE, Fla., Aug. 24, 2017 -- With the introduction of new terms such as “fake news” and “alternative facts,” one area of interest deserves attention is “fake research.” The latest report by the Institute for Public Relations outlines five methods for deciphering the quality of research we conduct, review, rely on, and share.
|
|||||
An infographic accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/da5de22d-95ee-4d71-b526-d6aaa5e15dcb
“We’ve seen a rise in research, especially through clickbaits on digital media, that’s widely shared and touted as fact, but it’s based on bad science or poor methodology,” said Dr. Sarab Kochhar, IPR Director of Research, and author of the report. “This guide will help communication practitioners become smarter consumers of research and help them use research in a responsible way.”
The guide offers an in-depth review of five questions to ask of research to help spot “fake” research:
- Is it generalizable?
- Is it unbiased?
- Is it transparent?
- Is it objective as possible?
- Is it ethical?
The full report can be downloaded for free on the IPR website and helps practitioners critically assess and analyze research as well as determine the extent to which it is generalizable, unbiased, transparent, objective, and ethical. An infographic summarizing the five questions can also be downloaded and shared.
To help practitioners become stronger researchers, IPR also offers an IPR Research Bootcamp, a one-day, step-by-step training on how to conduct and assess research, from planning to conducting to evaluation. Those interested in hosting or attending the IPR Research Bootcamp can contact Dr. Sarab Kochhar at [email protected].
About The Institute for Public Relations
The Institute for Public Relations is an independent, nonprofit research foundation dedicated to the science beneath the art of public relations™. IPR focuses on research that matters to the profession, providing timely insights and applied intelligence that professionals can put to immediate use. All research is available free at www.instituteforpr.org and provides the basis for IPR’s professional conferences and events.
Media Contact: Sarah Jackson Communications Manager Institute for Public Relations [email protected]
