SanDisk Joins Nasdaq-100, Replacing Atlassian on April 20 
OpenAI Addresses Security Vulnerability in macOS App Certification Process 
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028 
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis 
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion 
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast 
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs 
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization 
U.S. Automakers Push Back Against EU Rules Blocking American Trucks from European Market 
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG 
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy 
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict 
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave 
Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58% 
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit 
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts 
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses 
GAINESVILLE, Fla., Aug. 24, 2017 -- With the introduction of new terms such as “fake news” and “alternative facts,” one area of interest deserves attention is “fake research.” The latest report by the Institute for Public Relations outlines five methods for deciphering the quality of research we conduct, review, rely on, and share.
|
|||||
An infographic accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/da5de22d-95ee-4d71-b526-d6aaa5e15dcb
“We’ve seen a rise in research, especially through clickbaits on digital media, that’s widely shared and touted as fact, but it’s based on bad science or poor methodology,” said Dr. Sarab Kochhar, IPR Director of Research, and author of the report. “This guide will help communication practitioners become smarter consumers of research and help them use research in a responsible way.”
The guide offers an in-depth review of five questions to ask of research to help spot “fake” research:
- Is it generalizable?
- Is it unbiased?
- Is it transparent?
- Is it objective as possible?
- Is it ethical?
The full report can be downloaded for free on the IPR website and helps practitioners critically assess and analyze research as well as determine the extent to which it is generalizable, unbiased, transparent, objective, and ethical. An infographic summarizing the five questions can also be downloaded and shared.
To help practitioners become stronger researchers, IPR also offers an IPR Research Bootcamp, a one-day, step-by-step training on how to conduct and assess research, from planning to conducting to evaluation. Those interested in hosting or attending the IPR Research Bootcamp can contact Dr. Sarab Kochhar at [email protected].
About The Institute for Public Relations
The Institute for Public Relations is an independent, nonprofit research foundation dedicated to the science beneath the art of public relations™. IPR focuses on research that matters to the profession, providing timely insights and applied intelligence that professionals can put to immediate use. All research is available free at www.instituteforpr.org and provides the basis for IPR’s professional conferences and events.
Media Contact: Sarah Jackson Communications Manager Institute for Public Relations [email protected]
