US Expands Criminal Investigation Into Nicolas Maduro With New Florida Probe 
US Dollar Slips as Markets Weigh Potential US-Iran Peace Deal and Oil Price Outlook 
Synopsys Q2 FY2026 Earnings Beat Driven by AI and Semiconductor Demand 
S&P 500, Nasdaq Hit Record Highs as Iran Ceasefire Talks and AI Rally Boost Markets 
DOJ Pushes to Resume Trump White House Ballroom Project After Security Incident 
Asian Markets Slide as New U.S. Strikes on Iran Spark Investor Caution 
Elon Musk Explores Possible Tesla-SpaceX Merger Amid Growing AI Investments 
Australia Sues 3M for Over A$2 Billion Over PFAS Firefighting Foam Contamination 
NIO CEO Says China’s Auto Industry Has Passed Its Golden Era Amid Weak Car Sales 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury 
Amazon Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Trump Tariff Price Hikes 
Universal Music Group Rejects Pershing Square Takeover Proposal 
Minnesota ICE Agent Charged in Venezuelan Immigrant Shooting During Trump Immigration Crackdown 
South Korea Central Bank Holds Interest Rates Steady Amid Inflation Concerns 
Iran-U.S. Nuclear Talks Remain Unresolved as Strait of Hormuz Risks Keep Markets on Edge 
US Launches New Trade Investigation Into Vietnam Over Intellectual Property Concerns 
A US federal court dismissed the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust complaint against Facebook, as well as a related case brought by 48 state attorneys general in acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp.
Following the rulings, Facebook's shares rose over 4 percent on Monday, sending its market capitalization above $1 trillion for the first time.
The FTC, alongside attorneys general from 48 states, sued Facebook in December for engaging in a supposed strategy to eliminate threats to its monopoly, including its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014, which the FTC previously cleared.
The US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the FTC failed to prove its main contention that Facebook holds monopoly power in the US personal social networking market.
The court described FTC's complaint as legally insufficient for failing to plead enough facts to establish a necessary element of its claims, hence should be dismissed.
The court pointed out that the allegations do not even provide an estimated actual figure or range for Facebook’s market share over the past ten years, falling short of establishing that Facebook holds market power.
The court added that FTC’s Complaint says almost nothing concrete on how much power Facebook, and still has, in the product market, almost as if it expects the Court to simply agree on "the conventional wisdom that Facebook is a monopolist.”
But the court acknowledged that the FTC may be able to fix the weaknesses in its argument and left open the possibility for filing an amended complaint.
The court also disagreed with Facebook’s insistence that the FTC does not have the authority to question its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, which took place in 2012 and 2014.
It ruled that the FTC can still seek divestiture of these acquisitions if it succeeds in establishing Facebook’s monopoly power.
The court also dismissed the case filed by the state attorneys general, saying that the long delay between the acquisitions and the 2020 case filing was unprecedented on a state level.
It added that the argument about “Facebook preventing interoperability with competing apps" doesn't state a claim under the antitrust law, as such policy is not unlawful.
