Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
LG Energy Solution Shares Slide After Ford Cancels EV Battery Supply Deal 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
Oracle Stock Surges After Hours on TikTok Deal Optimism and OpenAI Fundraising Buzz 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
Harris Associates Open to Revised Paramount Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties 
Trump Signals Push for Lower Health Insurance Prices as ACA Premium Concerns Grow 
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround 
Elliott Management Takes $1 Billion Stake in Lululemon, Pushes for Leadership Change 
Seatrium Reaches $475 Million Settlement With Maersk Over Offshore Wind Vessel Project 
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report 
NEW YORK, Aug. 07, 2017 -- Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) announces that on August 4, 2017, it filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of its client Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan (“Steamfitters 449”) against MAXIMUS, INC. (“Maximus” or the “Company”) (NYSE:MMS), and certain of its senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”). The action, which is captioned Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan v. Maximus, Inc., No. 17-cv-00884 (E.D. Va.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, on behalf all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Maximus common stock between October 30, 2014 and February 3, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
On October 29, 2014, the United Kingdom Department for Work and Pensions awarded Maximus a significant contract to carry out health and disability benefits, called the Health Assessment Advisory Service (“HAAS”), over a period of three and a half years. The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, despite encountering problems from the start, Defendants assured investors that Maximus was meeting targets concerning the HAAS contract.
During the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) in obtaining the HAAS contract, Maximus set an unattainable target number of healthcare professionals to recruit and an unattainable target number of assessments; (ii) throughout the HAAS contract, Maximus was struggling to recruit, train and ramp-up new health care staff to perform the assessments; (iii) the inability to meet its target number of healthcare recruits and target number of assessments, meant Maximus would not earn the performance-based incentive fees from the HAAS contract; and (iv) consequently, Defendants’ statements about the Company, its financial condition, and the outlook for its business, including statements about the HAAS contract and the amount of revenue the Company expected the contract to contribute, lacked a reasonable basis when made.
On February 4, 2016, Maximus issued a press release announcing its earnings for the first quarter of fiscal 2016, again missing expectations and confirming its inability to meet HAAS contract assessment targets. The reduced earnings were based in part on weak performance of the HAAS contract, which “tempered operating margin.” On this news, shares of Maximus common stock dropped $5.53 per share over two trading sessions, or 10.5 percent.
If you purchased or acquired Maximus common stock during the Class Period, you are a member of the “Class” and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff. Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia no later than October 6, 2017. The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class. You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action. If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member. You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action.
If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Francis P. McConville, Esq. of Labaton Sucharow, at (800) 321-0476, or via email at [email protected]. You can view a copy of the complaint online at http://www.labaton.com/en/about/press/Labaton-Sucharow-Files-Securities-Class-Action-on-Behalf-of-Maximus-Inc-Investors.cfm
Steamfitters 449 is represented by Labaton Sucharow, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $2 trillion. Labaton Sucharow’s litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than 60 full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants. Labaton Sucharow has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications. Offices are located in New York, NY, Wilmington, DE, Washington, D.C., and Chicago, IL. More information about Labaton Sucharow is available at www.labaton.com.
Francis P. McConville, Esq. Labaton Sucharow (800) 321-0476 [email protected]
